Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: A prospective comparison study

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 88-93

  Pungpapong, Surakit ^a   Wallace, Michael B ^a   Woodward, Timothy A ^a   Noh, Kyung W ^a   Raimondo, Massimo ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic pancreatitis; Diagnosis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Endosonography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Indexed keywords

SECRETIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS SECRETION; PANCREAS STONE; PARENCHYMA; PHYSICAL DISEASE BY BODY FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATITIS, CHRONIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33845991869     PISSN: 01920790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31802dfde6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Forsmark CE. Chronic pancreatitis. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH, eds. Sleisenger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002:943-969.
2. Draganov P, Patel A, Fazel A, et al. Prospective evaluation of the accuracy of the intraductal secretin stimulation test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:695-699.
3. Raimondo M, Imoto M, DiMagno EP. Rapid endoscopic secretin stimulation test and discrimination of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer from disease controls. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:397-403.
4. Raimondo M, Wallace MB. Diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis by endoscopic ultrasound. Are we there yet? JOP. 2004;5:1-7.
5. Chowdhury R, Bhutani MS, Mishra G, et al. Comparative analysis of direct pancreatic function testing versus morphological assessment by endoscopic ultrasonography for the evaluation of chronic unexplained abdominal pain of presumed pancreatic origin. Pancreas. 2005;31:63-68.
6. Wallace MB, Hawes RH. Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2001;23:26-35.
7. Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Leodolter A, et al. EUS in the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:507-511.
8. Catalano MF, Lahoti S, Geena JE, et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:11-17.
9. Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GA, et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin. Endoscopy. 1993;25:555-564.
10. Lees WR. Endoscopic ultrasonography of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocysts. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1986;123:123-129.
11. Sahai AV, Mishra G, Penman ID, et al. EUS to detect evidence of pancreatic disease in patients with persistent or nonspecific dyspepsia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:153-159.
12. Hastier P, Buckley MJ, Francois E, et al. A prospective study of pancreatic disease in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis: comparative diagnosis value of ERCP and EUS and long-term significance of isolated parenchymal abnormalities. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:705-709.
13. Nattermann C, Goldschmidt AJW, Dancygier H. Endosonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparison between endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 1993;25:565-570.
14. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Calderon A, et al. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:347-353.
15. Del Frate C, Zanardi R, Mortele K, et al. Advances in imaging for pancreatic disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2002;4:140-148.
16. Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, et al. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiography. 1999;210:605-610.
17. Prasad SR, Sahani D, Saini S. Clinical applications of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33:362-366.
18. The International Working Group for Minimal Standard Terminology for Gastrointestinal Endosonography. Reproduction of minimum standard terminology in gastrointestinal endosonography. Dig Endosc. 1998;10:158-184.
19. Axon ATR, Classen M, Cotton PB, et al. Pancreatography in chronic pancreatitis: International definitions. Gut. 1984;25:1107-1112.
20. Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Durkalski V, et al. The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:294-299.
21. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology. 1994;192:73-78.
22. Irie H, Hond H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics. 2001;21:23-37.
23. Anand BS, Vij JC, Mac HS, et al. Effect of aging on the pancreatic ducts: a study based on endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;35:210-213.
24. Kreel L, Sandin B. Changes in pancreatic morphology associated with aging. Gut. 1973;14:962-970.
25. Nguyen PT, Hata K, Chang KJ. Endoscopic ultrasound criteria for chronic pancreatitis in the elderly [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49(4 suppl):AB96.
26. Rajan E, Clain JE, Levy MJ, et al. Age-related changes in the pancreas identified by EUS: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:401-406.
27. Carlos RC, Scheiman JM, Hussain HK, et al. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:620-630.