A statistical overview on univariate calibration, inverse regression, and detection limits: Application to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry technique

Mass Spectrometry Reviews

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-18

  Lavagnini, Irma ^a   Magno, Franco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Calibration; Detection limits; Inverse regression; Quantification

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING;

DETECTION LIMITS; INVERSE REGRESSION; UNIVARIATE REGRESSION;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; EQUIPMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REFERENCE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; GUIDELINES; REFERENCE VALUES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33845986337     PISSN: 02777037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mas.20100     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. ACS. 1980. Committee on Environmental Improvement. Guidelines for data acquisition and data quality evaluation in environmental chemistry. Anal Chem 52:2242-2249.
2. Analytical Method Committee. 1994. Is my calibration linear? Analyst 119:2363-2366.
3. Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. 1980. Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.
4. Brownlee KA. 1960. Statistical theory and methodology in science and engineering. New York: Wiley.
5. Brueggemann L, Morgenstern P, Wennrich R. 2005. Comparison of regression techniques for linear calibration. Accred Qual Assur 10:344-351.
6. Clayton CA, Hines JW, Elkins PD. 1987. Detection limits with specified assurance probabilities. Anal Chem 59:2506-2514.
7. Currie LA. 1997. Detection: International update, and some emerging dilemmas involving calibration, the blank, and multiple detection decisions. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 37:151-181.
8. Currie LA. 1995. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendation 1995). Pure Appl Chem 67:1699-1723.
9. Eurachem. 1993. Accreditation for chemical laboratories. Teddington, UK: Eurachem Secretariat.
10. Garden JS, Mitchell DG, Mills WN. 1980. Non-constant variance regression techniques for calibration-curve-based analysis. Anal Chem 52:2310-2315.
11. Hartley HO. 1950. The maximum F-ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variance. Biometrika 37:308-312.
12. Hubaux A, Vos G. 1970. Decision and detection limits for linear calibration curves. Anal Chem 42:849-855.
13. ISO. 1997. (International Organization for Standardization). Capability of detection- part I: Terms and definitions (11843-1) ISO Geneva, Switzerland.
14. IUPAC. 1976. Nomenclature, symbols, units and their usage in spectro-chemical analysis: II. Data interpretation. Pure Appl Chem 45:99-103.
15. Kaiser H. 1966. Zur Definition der Nachweisgrenze, der Garantiegrenzeund dr dabei benutzten Begriffe. Fresenius' Z Anal Chem 216:80-93.
16. Lavagnini I, Favaro G, Magno F. 2004. Non-linear and non-constant variance calibration curves in analysis of volatile organic compounds for testing of water by the purge-and-trap method coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Rapid Comm Mass Spectrom 18:1383-1391.
17. Lindner W, Wainer IW. 1996. Validated assays in the Journal of Chromatography B: An initial editorial position, J Chromat B 683:133-134.
18. Long GL, Winefordner JD. 1983. Limit of detection. A closer look at the IUPAC definition. Anal Chem 55:712A-723A.
19. Mandel J. 1967. The statistical analysis of experimental data. New York: Wiley.
20. Massart DL, Vandeginste BGM, Morgan SN, Michotte Y, Kaufman L. 1988. Chemometrics: A textbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21. Millard BJ. 1978. Quantitative mass spectrometry. London: Heyden & Son.
22. Miller RP. 1966. Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Miller JN. 1991. Basic statistical methods for Analytical Chemistry. Part 2. Calibration and regression methods. Analyst 116:3-14.
24. Miller JN. 1993. Outliers in experimental data and their treatment. Analyst 118:455-461.
25. Miller JC, Miller JN. 1988. Statistics for analytical chemistry. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
26. Mocak J, Bond AM, Mitchell S, Scollary G. 1997. A statistical overview of standard (IUPAC and ACS) and new procedures for determining the limits of detection and quantification: Application to voltammetric and stripping techniques. Pure Appl Chem 69:297-328.
27. Munch JW. (Ed). 1995. EPA METHOD 524.2 Measurements of purgeable organic compounds in water by capillary column gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, rev. 4.1, US EPA. Cincinnati.
28. Oppenheimer L, Capizzi TP, Weppelman RM, Metha H. 1983. Determining for lowest limit of reliable assay measurement. Anal Chem 55:638-643.
29. Schwartz LM. 1979. Calibration curves with non-uniform variance. Anal Chem 51:723-727.
30. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591-611.
31. Sharaf MA, Illman DL, Kowalski BR. 1986. Chemometrics. New York: Wiley.
32. US EPA. 1993. (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Guidance on evaluation, resolution, and documentation of analytical problems associated with compliance monitoring, EPA/821-B-93-001, Washington DC.
33. US Federal Register. 1984. Appendix B to Part 136 - Definition and procedure for the determination of method detection limit - Revision 1.11. 49(209):43430-43431.
34. Vial J, Jardy A. 1999. Experimental comparison of the different approaches to estimate LOD and LOQ of an HPLC method. Anal Chem 71:2672-2677.
35. Wilson MD, Rocke DM, Durbin B, Kahn HD. 2004. Detection limits and goodness-of-fit measures for the two-component model of chemical analytical error. Anal Chim Acta 509:197-208.
36. Zorn ME, Gibbons RD, Sonzogni WC. 1997. Weighted least-squares approach to calculating limits of detection and quantification by modeling variability as a function of concentration. Anal Chem 69:3069-3075.