A prototype to analyze and support standardization decisions

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 195-207

  Schade, Sven ^a   Buxmann, Peter ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RAPID PROTOTYPING;

STANDARDIZATION DECISIONS; STANDARDIZATION PROBLEMS;

STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 33845985289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563808     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Ahuja, R. K., Magnanti, T. L, Orlin, J. B.; 1993; Network flows : Theory, algorithms, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
2. Arthur, W. B.; 1989; Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events; The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, p. 116-131.
3. Arthur, W. B.; 1996; Increasing returns and the new World of business; Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, p. 100-109.
4. Besen, S. M., Farrell, J.; 1994; Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization; Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, p. 117-131.
5. Buxmann, P., Weitzel, T., Westarp, F., König, W.; 1999; The Standardization Problem - An Economic Analysis of Standards in Information Systems; Paper presented at the 1st IEEE Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology SIIT 99, Aachen.
6. Chekuri, C. S., Goldberg, A. V., Karger, D. R., Levine, M. S., Stein, C.; 1997; Experimental Study of Minimum Cut Algorithms; Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, New Orleans.
7. Cherkassky, V. B., Goldberg, A. V.; 1997; On Implementing Push-Relabel Method for the Maximum Flow Problem; Algorithmica, Vol. 19, p. 390-410.
8. Cowan, R. A., Miller, J. H.; 1998; Technological standards with local externalities and decentralized behaviour, Vol. 8(3), p. 285-296.
9. David, P. A.; 1985; Clio and the economics of QWERTY; American Economic Review, Vol. 75, p. 332-337.
10. Domschke, W., Wagner, B.; 2005; Models and Methods for Standardisation Problems; European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 162, p. 713-726.
11. Economides, N., Himmelberg, C.; 1995; Critical mass and network size with application to the US fax market; Working paper series // Stern School of Business, NYU EC ; 95,11, http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/95-11.pdf.
12. Farrell, J., Saloner, G.; 1985; Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation; Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 16(1), p. 70-83.
13. Farrell, J., Saloner, G.; 1986; Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements, and predation, Vol. 76(5), p. 940-955.
14. Gandal, N.; 1994; Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test for Network Externalities; RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 25(1), p. 160-170.
15. Hartmann, R. S., Teece, D. J.; 1990; Product emulation strategies in the presence of reputation effects and network externalities: some evidence from the minicomputer industry; Economics of innovation and newtechnology, Vol. 1-2, p. 157-182.
16. Katz, M. L., Shapiro, C.; 1985; Network externalities, competition, and compatibility; American Economic Review Vol. 75(3), p. 424-440.
17. Katz, M. L., Shapiro, C.; 1986; Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities; Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, p. 822-841.
18. Katz, M. L., Shapiro, C.; 1992; Product Introduction with Network Externalities; Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 40(1), p. 55-83.
19. Katz, M. L., Shapiro, C.; 1994; Systems competition and network effects; Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, p. 93-115.
20. Kimms, A.; 2003; Costing Communication Standards in Information Systems Using a Minimum Cut Approach; Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 54, p. 426-431.
21. Kleinemeyer, J.; 1998; Standardisierung zwischen Kooperation und Wettbewerb. Frankfurt: P. Lang.
22. Law, A. M., Kelton, W. D.; 2000; Simulation modeling and analysis (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
23. Liebowitz, S. J., Margolis, S. E.; 1995; Path dependence, lock-in and history; Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 11, p. 205-226.
24. Moch, D.; 1995; Ein Preisindex für PC-Datenbanksoftware - Eine empirische Untersuchung; In D. Harhoff, M. Müller (Eds.), Preismessung und technischer Fortschritt; Baden Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.
25. Oren, S. S., Smith, S. A.; 1981; Critical Mass and Tariff Structure in Electronic Communications Markets; Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, p. 467-487.
26. Plouraboue, F., Steyer, A., Zimmermann, J.-B.; 1998; Learning induced criticality in consumers' adoption pattern : a neural network approach, Vol. 6(1), p. 73-90.
27. Rohlfs, J.; 1974; A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communication Service; Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 5(1), p. 16-37.
28. Shapiro, C., Varian, H. R.; 1999; Information rules : a strategic guide to the network economy. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
29. Weitzel, T., Son, S., König, W.; 2001; Infrastrukturentscheidungen in vernetzten Unternehmen. Eine Wirtschaftlichkeitsanalyse am Beispiel von X. 500 Directory Services; Wirtschaftsinformatik, Vol. 43(4), p. 371-381.
30. Weitzel, T.; 2004; Economics of standards in information networks : with 70 tables ([1. Ed] ed.). Heidelberg: Physica.
31. Westarp, F., Weitzel, T., Buxmann, P., König, W.; 2000; The Standardization Problem in Networks - A General Framework; In K. Jakobs (Ed.), Information Technology Standards and Standardization: A Global Perspective, p. 168-185: Idea Publishing Group.
32. Winston, W. L.; 1994; Operations research : applications and algorithms (3rd ed ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
33. Yang, Y.-N.; 1997; Essays on Network Effects; Ph.D Thesis, Utah State University, Logan.