Rejuvenating a foundering institutional review board: One institution's story

Academic Medicine

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-17

  De Ville, Kenneth ^a   Hassler, Gregory ^a   Lewis, Michael J ^a,b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH SCIENCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; OFFICE WORKER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STAFF;

EID: 33845975669     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000250026.79494.1c     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Christain MC, Goldberg JL, Killen J, et al. A central institutional review board for multiinstitutional trials. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1405-1408.
2. Steinbrook R. Improving protection for research subjects. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:716-720.
3. Roehr B. Institutional review boards in crisis. The Scientist. 2005;19:42.
4. Loh ED, Meyer RE. Medical schools' attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of central institutional review boards. Acad Med. 2004;79:644-651.
5. Office of the Inspector General. Institutional Review Boards: Time for Reform. Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General; July 11, 1998.
6. Hanna KE. Research ethics: reports, scandals, calls for change. Hastings Cent Rep. 2000;30:6.
7. Levine RJ. Statement on Institutional Review Boards. Available at: (http://www.aamc.org/advocacy/library/research/testimony/1998/061198.htm). Accessed September 20, 2006.
8. Sengupta S, Lo B. The roles and experiences of nonaffiliated and non-scientist members of institutional review boards. Acad Med. 2003;78:212-218.
9. 45 C.F.R. 46.401-45 C.F.R. 46.409.
10. CITI: Course in The Protection of Human Research Subjects. Available at: (https://www. citiprogram.org/default.asp). Accessed September 20, 2006.
11. Amdur R. Institutional Review Member Handbook. Boston, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2003.
12. PRIM&R: Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research. Available at: (http://www.primr. org/education/overview.html). Accessed September 20, 2006.
13. Office of the Inspector General. Institutional Review Boards: The Emergence of Independent Boards. Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General; DHHS June 1998, OEI-01-97-00192: p 37.
14. Office for Human Research Protections. Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement: A Guided Self-Assessment for Human Research Protection Programs. Available at: (http:// www.hhs.gov/ohrp/qi). Accessed September 20, 2006.
15. Office for Human Research Protections Division of Assurances and Quality Improvement. Objectives and Overview of the OHRP Quality Improvement Program, April 15, 2002. Available at: (http://www.hhs. gov/ohrp/humansubjects/qip/ qipdesc.pdf). Accessed September 20, 2006.
16. Surgarman J, Getz K, Speckman JL, et al. The cost of institutional review boards. N Eng J Med. 2005;352:1825-1827.
17. Levine R. Institutional review boards: a crisis in confidence. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134: 161-163.10.1097/01.ACM.0000249968.20981.36