Mobility activity of stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation

Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 8-15

  Egerton, Thorlene ^a   Maxwell, Douglas J ^b   Granat, Malcolm H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Activity; Mobility; Physiotherapy; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL CARE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CARE; RIVERMEAD MOBILITY INDEX; STANDING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STROKE; UNITED KINGDOM; WALKING SPEED;

EID: 33845971307     PISSN: 10137025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1013-7025(07)70003-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. The Glasgow Augmented Physiotherapy Study (GAPS) group. Can augmented physiotherapy input enhance recovery of mobility after stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabilitation 2004;18:529-37.
2. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. BMJ 1997;314:1151-9.
3. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials. Stroke 1997;28:2139-43.
4. Indredavik B, Bakke F, Solberg R, et al. Benefits of a stroke unit: a randomised controlled trial. Stroke 1991;22:1026-31.
5. Langhorne P, Dennis M. Stroke Units: An Evidence Based Approach. London: BMJ Books, 1998.
6. Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? Physiother Res Int 1996;1:75-88.
7. Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, et al. Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke 2004;35:1005-9.
8. Lincoln N, Willis D, Philips SA, et al. Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. Stroke 1996;27:18-23.
9. Carr J, Shepherd R. The adaptive system: plasticity and recovery. In: Carr J, Shepherd R. Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998;10-2.
10. Collin C, Wade D, Davis S, et al. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:61-3.
11. Collen F, Wade D, Robb G, et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991;13:50-4.
12. Wade D. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford University Press, 1992.
13. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1972; 1:233-8.
14. Rankin J. Cerebrovascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. Prog Scottish Med J 1957;2:200-15.
15. Jun M. An Improved System for Long-term Ambulatory Monitoring of Posture and Mobility Related Daily Physical Activity [PhD dissertation]. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 1999.
16. Barbenel JC, Maxwell DJ. Development of reference loading spectrum. DTI Materials Technology and Standardisation Programme: Advanced Materials 1 - Development of Lifetime Prediction Test Methods for Orthopaedic Implants. 1995.
17. Forlander D, Bohannon R. Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:97-100.
18. Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1964;26: 211-52.