Comparison and validation of scoring systems in a cohort of patients treated for biliary acute pancreatitis

Pancreas

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 66-69

  Göçmen, Erdal ^a   Kiliç, Yusuf Alper ^b   Yoldaş, Ömer ^a   Ertan, Tamer ^a   Karaköse, Nazile ^a   Koç, Mahmut ^a   Tez, Mesut ^a,c  

^a ANKARA TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Acute pancreatitis; Mortality; Scoring systems

Indexed keywords

ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; APACHE; AREA UNDER CURVE; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATITIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845969501     PISSN: 08853177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000246667.53622.e3     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Osvaldt AB, Viero P, Borges da Costa MS, et al. Evaluation of Ranson, Glasgow, APACHE-II, and APACHE-O criteria to predict severity in acute biliary pancreatitis. Int Surg. 2001;86:158-161.
2. Simchuk EJ, Traverso LW, Nukui Y, et al. Computed tomography severity index is a predictor of outcomes for severe pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 2000;179:352-355.
3. Eachempati SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS. Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: comparative analysis of the Ranson score and the APACHE III score. Arch Surg. 2002;137:730-736.
4. Kilic YA, Dogrul AB, Karakoc D, et al. Impact of organ failure on mortality prediction in a Turkish surgical intensive care unit. Int Care Med. 2005;31(suppl 1):S47.
5. Bradley III EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586-590.
6. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and the use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29-36.
7. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115:92-106.
8. Heath DI, Imrie CW. The Hong Kong criteria and severity prediction in acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol. 1994;15:179-185.
9. Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW. Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1260-1264.
10. Williams M, Simms HH. Prognostic usefulness of scoring systems in critically ill patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:901-907.
11. Dominguez-Munoz JE, Carballo F, Garcia MJ, et al. Evaluation of the clinical usefulness of APACHE II and SAPS systems in the initial prognostic classification of acute pancreatitis: a multicenter study. Pancreas. 1993;8:682-686.
12. Khan AA, Parekh D, Cho Y, et al. Improved prediction of outcome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis by the APACHE II score at 48 hours after hospital admission compared with the APACHE II score at admission. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation. Arch Surg. 2002;137:1136-1140.