A Bayesian false discovery rate for multiple testing

Journal of Applied Statistics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-9

  Whittemore, Alice S ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayes; Breast cancer; False discovery rate; False positive report probability; Haplotypes; Multiple comparisons; Single nucleotide polymorphism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845963840     PISSN: 02664763     EISSN: 13600532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02664760600994745     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological, 57(1), pp. 289-300.
2. Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency Annals of Statistics, 29(4), pp. 1165-1188.
3. Kuschel, B. and Auranen, A. and McBride, S. and Novik, K. and Antoniou, A. and Lipscombe, J. and Day, N. and Easton, D. and Ponder, B. and Pharoah, P. and Dunning, A. (2002) Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility Human Molecular Genetics, 11(12), pp. 1399-1407.
4. Matullo, G. and Berwick, M. and Vineis, P. (2005) Gene-environment interactions: How many false positives? Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97(8), pp. 550-551.
5. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J.(1991) Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. New York: Chapman & Hall.
6. Storey, J. and Tibshirani, R.(2003). Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. In [pp. 9440-9445].
7. Thomas, D. and Clayton, D. (2004) Betting odds and genetic associations Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96(6), pp. 421-423.
8. Wacholder, S. and Chanock, S. and Garcia-Closas, M. and El Ghormli, L. and Rothman, N. (2004) Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: An approach for molecular epidemiology studies Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96(6), pp. 434-442.