Partial molecular characterization of a mild isolate of Grapevine fanleaf virus from South Moravia, Czech Republic

Acta Virologica

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 201-205

  Kominek P ^a   Bryxiova M ^a   Glasa, M ^b  

^a CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Coat protein; Grapevine fanleaf virus; Movement protein; Secondary RNA structure

Indexed keywords

COAT PROTEIN; MOVEMENT PROTEIN; NUCLEOTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VIRUS PROTEIN; VIRUS RNA;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CZECH REPUBLIC; GENE DELETION; NEPOVIRUS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; RNA SEQUENCE; VIRUS GENOME; VIRUS ISOLATION;

3' UNTRANSLATED REGIONS; BASE SEQUENCE; CAPSID PROTEINS; CZECH REPUBLIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NEPOVIRUS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT DISEASES; PLANT VIRAL MOVEMENT PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VITIS;

GRAPEVINE FANLEAF VIRUS;

EID: 33845959538     PISSN: 0001723X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Andret-Link P, Schmitt-Keichinger C, Demangeat G, Komar V, Fuchs M (2004): The specific transmission of Grapevine fanleaf virus by its nematode vector Xiphinema index is solely determined by the viral coat protein. Virology 320, 12-22.
2. Auger J, Aballay EE, Pinto CM, Pastenes VC (1992): Effect of grapevine fanleaf virus (GFV) on growth and productivity of grapevine plants cv. Thompson Seedless. Fitopatología 27, 85-89.
3. Belin C, Schmitt C, Gaire F, Walter B, Demangeat G, Pinck L (1999): The nine C-terminal residues of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus movement protein are critical for systemic virus spread. J. Gen. Virol. 80, 1347-1356.
4. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL (2005): GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, Database issue D34-D38.
5. Haldeman-Cahill R, Daros JA, Carrington JC (1998): Secondary structures in the capsid protein coding sequence and 3′ nontranslated region involved in amplification of the tobacco etch virus genome. J. Virol. 72, 4072-4079.
6. Hofacker IL (2003): Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3429-3431.
7. Komínek P, Holleinová V (2003): Evaluation of sanitary status of grapevines in the Czech Republic. Plant Soil Environ. 49, 63-66.
8. Komínek P, Glasa M, Bryxiová M (2005): Analysis of the molecular variability of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 reveals the presence of two distinct virus groups and their mixed occurrence in grapevines. Virus Genes 31, 247-255.
9. Krake LR, Scott NS, Rezaian MA, Tylor RH (1999): Graft-Transmitted Diseases of Grapevines. Collingwood, Victoria, CSIRO Publishing, Xi + 439 pp.
10. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004): MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 5, 150-163.
11. Le Gall O, Candresse T, Dunez J (1995): Transfer of the 3′ non-translated region of grapevine chrome mosaic virus RNA-1 by recombination to tomato black ring virus RNA-2 in pseudorecombinant isolates. J. Gen. Virol. 76, 1285-1289.
12. MacKenzie DJ, McLean MA, Mukerji S, Green M (1997): Improved RNA extraction from woody plants for the detection of viral pathogens by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Plant Dis. 81, 222-226.
13. Naraghi-Arani P, Daubert S, Rowhani A (2001): Quasispecies nature of the genome of Grapevine fanleaf virus. J. Gen. Virol. 82, 1791-1795.
14. Rabindran S, Robertson C, Achor D, German-Retana S, Holt CA, Dawson WO (2005): Odontoglossum ringspot virus host range restriction in Nicotiana sylvestris maps to the replicase gene. Mol. Plant Pathol. 6, 439-447.
15. Rodríguez-Cerezo E, Klein PG, Shaw JG (1991): A determinant of disease symptom severity is located in the 39-terminal noncoding region of the RNA of a plant virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9863-9867.
16. Wetzel T, Jardak R, Meunier L, Ghorbel A, Reustle GM, Krczal G (2002): Simultaneous RT/PCR detection and differentiation of arabis mosaic and grapevine fanleaf nepoviruses in grapevines with a single pair of primers. J. Virol. Methods 101, 63-69.