Methods of sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnancy: A review of the literature

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 755-762

  Meijer Hoogeveen, Madelon ^a   Stoutenbeek, Philip ^a   Visser, Gerard H A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cervix; Methods; Pregnancy; Review; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; METHYLCELLULOSE;

CERVIX ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FUNNELING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSABDOMINAL ECHOGRAPHY; TRANSPERINEAL ECHOGRAPHY; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; UTERINE CERVIX INCOMPETENCE;

CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 33845956529     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767050600852601     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Gramellini D, Fieni S, Molina E, Berretta R, Vadora E. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:227-232.
2. Hoesli IM, Strutas D, Tercanli S, Holzgreve W. Charts for cervical length in singleton pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;82:161-165.
3. Kushnir O, Vigil DA, Izquierdo L, Schiff M, Curet LB. Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:991-993.
4. Okitsu O, Mimura T, Nakayama T, Aono T. Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:402-409.
5. Tongsong T, Kamprapanth P, Pitaksakorn J. Cervical length in normal pregnancy as measured by transvaginal sonography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;58:313-315.
6. Zorzoli A, Soliani A, Perra M, Caravelli E, Galimberti A, Nicolini U. Cervical changes throughout pregnancy as assessed by transvaginal sonography. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:960-964.
7. Arabin B, Aardenburg R, van Eyck J. Maternal position and ultrasonic cervical assessment in multiple pregnancy. Preliminary observations. J Reprod Med 1997;42:719-724.
8. Fujita MM, Brizot MD, Liao AW, Bernath T, Cury L, Neto JD, Zugaib M. Reference range for cervical length in twin pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:856-859.
9. Bergelin I, Valentin L. Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: A longitudinal, observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:556-563.
10. Ramin KD, Ogburn PL, Mulholland TA, Breckle RJ, Ramsey PS. Ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length in triplet pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1442-1445.
11. Cook CM, Ellwood DA. A longitudinal study of the cervix in pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:16-18.
12. Bergelin I, Valentin L. Normal cervical changes in parous women during the second half of pregnancy - a prospective, longitudinal ultrasound study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:31-38.
13. Bergelin I, Valentin L. Patterns of normal change in cervical length and width during pregnancy in nulliparous women: A prospective, longitudinal ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:217-222.
14. Liabsuetrakul T, Suntharasaj T, Suwanrath C, Leetanaporn R, Rattanaprueksachart R, Tuntiseranee P. Serial translabial sonographic measurement of cervical dimensions between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation in pregnant Thai women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:168-173.
15. Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Novakov A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: Relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:304-311.
16. Hendler I, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, Iams JD, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, MacPherson CA, Caritis SN, Miodovnik M, Menard KM, et al. The Preterm Prediction study: Association between maternal body mass index and spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:882-886.
17. Palma-Dias RS, Fonseca MM, Stein NR, Schmidt AP, Magalhaes JA. Relation of cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation to demographic characteristics and obstetric history. Braz J Med Biol Res 2004;37:737-744.
18. To MS, Skentou C, Cicero S, Nicolaides KH. Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks' scan: Problems with transabdominal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:292-296.
19. Sonek J, Shellhaas C. Cervical sonography: A review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:71-78.
20. Owen J. Evaluation of the cervix by ultrasound for the prediction of preterm birth. Clin Perinatol 2003;30:735-755.
21. Welsh A, Nicolaides K. Cervical screening for preterm delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14:195-202.
22. Owen J, Iams JD. What we have learned about cervical ultrasound. Semin Perinatol 2003;27:194-203.
23. Colombo DF, Iams JD. Cervical length and preterm labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43:735-745.
24. Honest H, Bachmann LM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: A systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:305-322.
25. Rozenberg P, Gillet A, Ville Y. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: Review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:302-311.
26. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP. Cervical incompetence: A reappraisal of an obstetric controversy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002;57:377-387.
27. Iams JD. Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:402-412.
28. Guzman ER, Benito C, Hanley M. Sonography in the evaluation of the cervix during pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:99-105.
29. Maymon R, Shulman A, Ariely S, Halperin R, Caspi E, Weinraub Z. Sonographic assessment of cervical changes during pregnancy and delivery: Current concepts. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996;67:149-155.
30. Mason GC, Maresh MJ. Alterations in bladder volume and the ultrasound appearance of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:457-458.
31. Andersen HF. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:77-83.
32. Jeanty P, d'Alton M, Romero R, Hobbins JC. Perineal scanning. Am J Perinatol 1986;3:289-295.
33. Hertzberg BS, Bowie JD, Weber TM, Carroll BA, Kliewer MA, Jordan SG. Sonography of the cervix during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy: Value of the transperineal approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:73-76.
34. Hertzberg BS, Livingston E, Delong DM, McNally PJ, Fazekas CK, Kliewer MA. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: Transperineal versus endovaginal imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:1071-1078.
35. Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, To MS, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: Comparison of transvaginal and transperineal- translabial ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:335-340.
36. Owen J, Neely C, Northen U. Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: A blinded comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:780-783.
37. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Redondo C. Transperineal sonography in 2nd trimester to term pregnancy and early labor. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10:481-485.
38. Carr DB, Smith K, Parsons L, Chansky K, Shields LE. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: Agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:554-558.
39. Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:191-194.
40. Kurtzman JT, Goldsmith LJ, Gall SA, Spinnato JA. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: A blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:852-857.
41. Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Baumeister LA, McNally PB, Fazekas CK. Optimizing transperineal sonographic imaging of the cervix: The hip elevation technique. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13:933-936.
42. Valentin L, Bergelin I. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:256-262.
43. Lazanakis M, Marsh MS, Brockbank E, Economides DL. Assessment of the cervix in the third trimester of pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound scanning. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;105:31-35.
44. Burger M, Weber-Rossler T, Willmann M. Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: An interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:188-193.
45. Vayssiere C, Moriniere C, Camus E, Le Strat Y, Poty L, Fermanian J, Ville Y. Measuring cervical length with ultrasound: Evaluation of the procedures and duration of a learning method. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:575-579.
46. Yost NP, Bloom SL, Twickler DM, Leveno KJ. Pitfalls in ultrasonic cervical length measurement for predicting preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:510-516.
47. To MS, Skentou C, Chan C, Zagaliki A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical assessment at the routine 23-week scan: Standardizing techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:217-219.
48. Yazici G, Yildiz A, Tiras MB, Arslan M, Kanik A, Oz U. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery. J Clin Ultrasound 2004;32:225-230.
49. Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Texeira L, Wapner RJ. Cervical funneling: Sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:161-166.
50. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Pages G, Mendoza G. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: A new perspective. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14:719-724.
51. Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Farrell TA, Delong DM. Spontaneously changing gravid cervix: Clinical implications an prognostic features. Radiology 1995;196:721-724.
52. Brieger GM, Ning XH, Dawkins RR, Ying KQ, Weng C, Chang AM, Haines CJ. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical dynamics during the third trimester of normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76:118-122.
53. Crane JM, Van den Hof M, Armson BA, Liston R. Transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of preterm delivery: Singleton and twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:357-363.
54. Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain M, Dildy GA, Miodovnik M, Langer O, Sibai B, McNellis D. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA 2001;286:1340-1348.
55. Yost NP, Owen J, Berghella V, MacPherson C, Swain M, Dildy GA, Miodovnik M, Langer O, Sibai B. Secondtrimester cervical sonography: Features other than cervical length to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:457-462.
56. To MS, Skentou C, Liao AW, Cacho A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length and funneling at 23 weeks of gestation in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:200-203.
57. Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, O'Reilly-Green C, Benito CW, Palermo A, Vintzileos AM. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:204-210.
58. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Kimmel S, Roberts WE, Hess LW. Does the presence of a funnel increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in a patient with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1060-1066.
59. Leung TN, Pang MW, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK. Cervical length at 18-22 weeks of gestation for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in Hong Kong Chinese women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:713-717.
60. de Carvalho MH, Bittar RE, Brizot Mde L, Bicudo C, Zugaib M. Prediction of preterm delivery in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:532-536.
61. Yang JH, Kuhlman K, Daly S, Berghella V. Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sonography in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:288-291.
62. Andrews WW, Copper R, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Neely C, Dubard M. Second-trimester cervical ultrasound: Associations with increased risk for recurrent early spontaneous delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:222-226.
63. Parulekar SG, Kiwi R. Dynamic incompetent cervix uteri. Sonographic observations. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:481-485.
64. Guzman ER, Rosenberg JC, Houlihan C, Ivan J, Waldron R, Knuppel R. A new method using vaginal ultrasound and transfundal pressure to evaluate the asymptomatic incompetent cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:248-252.
65. MacDonald R, Smith P, Vyas S. Cervical incompetence: The use of transvaginal sonography to provide an objective diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:211-216.
66. Guzman ER, Vintzileos AM, McLean DA, Martins ME, Benito CW, Hanley ML. The natural history of a positive response to transfundal pressure in women at risk for cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:634-638.
67. Wong G, Levine D, Ludmir J. Maternal postural challenge as a functional test for cervical incompetence. J Ultrasound Med 1997;16:169-175.
68. Guzman ER, Pisatowski DM, Vintzileos AM, Benito CW, Hanley ML, Ananth CV. A comparison of ultrasonographically detected cervical changes in response to transfundal pressure, coughing, and standing in predicting cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:660-665.
69. Meath AI, Ramsey PS, Mulholland TA, Rosenquist RG, Lesnick T, Ramin KD. Comparative longitudinal study of cervical length and induced shortening changes among singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1410-1415.
70. Arabin B, van Eyck J. Sonographic diagnosis of cervical incompetence for prevention and management. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 2001;1:195-204.
71. Arabin B, Hü bener M, Halbesma J, van Eyck J. Sonographic diagnosis of cervical incompetence in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 2001;1:340-349.
72. Karis JP, Hertzberg BS, Bowie JD. Sonographic diagnosis of premature cervical dilatation. Potential pitfall due to lower uterine segment contractions. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10:83-87.
73. O'Brien JM, Allen AA, Barton JR. Intravaginal saline as a contrast agent for cervical sonography in the obstetric patient. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:137-139.
74. Robinson JN, Economy KE, Feinberg BB, Norwitz ER. Cervical hydrosonography in pregnancy to assess cervical length by transabdominal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:1023-1025.
75. Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Morris E, Fraser D. Intra-vaginal hydrosonography and cervical length assessment in pregnant women before induction of labour: A modified technique. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:435-439.
76. O'Brien JM, Houseman BA, Allen AA, Barton JR. Methylcellulose gel is a superior contrast agent for ultrasound examination of the cervix in obstetric patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:149-151.
77. Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, Berghella V, Parker L, Goldberg B, Wapner R. Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:351-358.
78. Severi FM, Bocchi C, Florio P, Picciolini E, D'Aniello G, Petraglia F. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of the cervix to predict preterm delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1261-1265.
79. Towner D, Boe N, Lou K, Gilbert WM. Cervical length measurements in pregnancy are longer when measured with three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;16:167-170.
80. Hoesli IM, Surbek DV, Tercanli S, Holzgreve W. Three dimensional volume measurement of the cervix during pregnancy compared to conventional 2D-sonography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;64:115-119.
81. Rozenberg P, Rafii A, Senat MV, Dujardin A, Rapon J, Ville Y. Predictive value of two-dimensional and three-dimensional multiplanar ultrasound evaluation of the cervix in preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13:237-241.
82. Strauss A, Heer I, Fuchshuber S, Janssen U, Hillemanns P, Hepp H. Sonographic cervical volumetry in higher order multiple gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16:346-53.
83. Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, Valentin L. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the cervix for the prediction of successful induction of labor with prostaglandin in prolonged pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:933-939.
84. Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, Valentin L. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:132-137.