Risk prediction models: Recalibration [3]

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 326-327

  Harrison, David A ^a   Parry, Gareth J ^b   Rowan, Kathy ^a  

^a King's College London   (United Kingdom)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; GEOMETRY; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LETTER; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

CALIBRATION; CRITICAL CARE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ADJUSTMENT; ROC CURVE;

EID: 33845949528     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251851.45006.89     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Wagner DP: What accounts for the difference between observed and predicted? Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1552-1553
2. Harrison DA, Brady AR, Parry GJ, et al: Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1378-1388
3. Linnet K: Assessing diagnostic tests by a strictly proper scoring rule. Stat Med 1989; 8:609-618
4. Zagoria RJ, Reggia JA: Transferability of medical decision support systems based on Bayesian classification. Med Decis Making 1983; 3:501-510
5. Mittlbock M, Schemper M: Explained variation for logistic regression. Stat Med 1996; 15:1987-1997