Comparison of different methods of routine typing of Indian isolates of foot-and-mouth disease virus [4]

Acta Virologica

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 279-280

  Nagendrakumar, S B ^a   Mythili, T ^a   Maroudam, V ^a   Madhan Mohan, M ^a   Thiagarajan, D ^a   Srinivasan, V A ^a  

^a Indian Immunologicals Limited   (India)

Author keywords

ELISA; Foot and mouth disease virus; RT PCR, SNAP hybridization

Indexed keywords

ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; INDIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; NONHUMAN; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; VIRUS CULTURE; VIRUS ISOLATION; VIRUS TYPING;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELLS, CULTURED; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; INDIA; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS;

EID: 33845943789     PISSN: 0001723X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Hamblin C, Armstrong RM, Hedger RS, Vet. Microbiology 9, 435-444, 1984.
2. Roeder PL, Le Blanc Smith PM, Res. Vet. Sci. 45, 225-230, 1987.
3. Vangrysperre W, De Clercq K, Arch. Virol 141, 331-344, 1996.
4. Alexandersen S, Forsyth MA, Reid SM, Belsham GJ, J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 4604-4613, 2000.
5. Reid SM, Hutchings GH, Ferris NP, Clercq KD, J. Virol. Methods 83, 113-123, 1999.
6. Meyer RF, Pacciarini M, Hilyard EJ, Ferrari S, Vakharia VN, Donini G, Brocchi E, Molitor TW, Virus Res. 32, 299-312, 1994.