A comparison of postoperative hypoesthesia between two types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, using the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential method

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-14

  Takazakura, D ^a   Ueki, K ^a   Nakagawa, K ^a   Marukawa, K ^a   Shimada, M ^a   Shamiul, A ^a   Yamamoto, E ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

hypoesthesia; lower lip; osteotomy; trigeminal somatosensory evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPESTHESIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOWER LIP; MALE; MANDIBLE OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROGNATHIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CRANIAL NERVE INJURIES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPESTHESIA; LIP; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OSTEOTOMY; PROGNATHISM; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

EID: 33845929321     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. August M., Marchena J., Donady J., and Kaban L. Neurosensory deficit and functional impairment after sagittal ramus osteotomy: a long-term follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56 (1998) 1231-1235
2. Bell W.H. Mandibular prognathism. Modern Practice in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Surgery (1992), Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 61 2111-2137
3. Bennett A.J., Wastell D.G., Barker G.R., Blackburn C.W., and Rood J.P. Trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials: a review of the literature as applicable to oral dysesthesias. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 16 (1987) 408-415
4. Dal Pont G. Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg 19 (1961) 42-47
5. De Beukelaer J.G., Smeele L.E., and van Ginkel F.C. Is short-term neurosensory testing after removal of mandibular third molars efficacious?. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 85 (1998) 366-370
6. Epker B.M. Modification in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg 35 (1977) 157-159
7. Hall H.D., and McKenna S.J. Further refinement and evaluation of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45 (1987) 684-688
8. Hunsuck E.E. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for the correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 26 (1968) 250-253
9. Jones D.L., and Wolford L.M. Intraoperative recording of trigeminal evoked potentials during orthognathic surgery. Int J Orthod Orthognath Surg 5 (1990) 167-174
10. Leira J.I., and Gilhuus-Moe O.T. Sensory impairment following sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular retrognathism. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 6 (1991) 161-167
11. Lemke R.R., Rugh J.D., Van Sickels J., Bays R.A., and Clark G.M. Neurosensory differences after wire and rigid fixation in patients with mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillfac Surg 58 (2000) 1354-1359
12. Nakagawa K., Ueki K., Matsumoto N., Takatsuka S., Yamamoto E., and Ooe H. The assessment of trigeminal sensory nerve paraesthesia after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: modified somatosensory evoked potentials recording method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 25 (1997) 97-101
13. Nakagawa K., Ueki K., Takatsuka S., Daisuke T., and Yamaomoto E. Somatosensory-evoked potential to evaluate the trigeminal nerve after sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91 (2001) 146-152
14. Nakagawa K., Ueki K., Takatsuka S., and Yamamoto E. Trigeminal nerve hypesthesia after sagittal split osteotomy in setback cases: Correlation of postoperative computed tomography and long-term trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61 (2003) 898-903
15. Narita Y., Nagai M., and Kuzuhara S. Trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials before, during, and after an inferior alveolar nerve block in normal subjects. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 51 (1997) 241-247
16. Takeuchi T., Furusawa K., and Hirose I. Mechanism of transient mental nerve paraesthesia in sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32 (1994) 105-108
17. Teerijoki-Oksa T., Jääskeläinen S., Forssell K., Forssell H., Vähätalo K., Tammisalo T., and Virtanen A. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31 (2002) 33-39
18. Trauner R., and Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty: surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10 (1957) 677-689
19. Tuinzing D.B., and Greebe R.B. Complications related to the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Surg 14 (1985) 319-324
20. Ueki K., Nakagawa K., Takatsuka S., and Yamamoto E. Plate fixation after mandibular osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 (2001) 490-496
21. Upton A.R., and McComas A.J. The double crush in nerve entrapment syndrome. Lancet 2 (1973) 359-362
22. Vriens J.P.M., and Pasman J.W. Assessment of trigeminal nerve function by means of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials after microneurosurgical repair. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 22 (1994) 156-162
23. Westermark A., Bystedt H., and von Konow L. Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36 (1998) 425-428