Influence of ultrasonic setting on tensile bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to dentin

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 401-407

  Cestari Fagundes, Ticiane ^a   Esteves Barata, Terezinha Jesus ^a   Bresciani, Eduardo ^a   Gigo Cefaly, Daniela Francisca ^b   Ramos Carvalho, Carlos Augusto ^a   Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NORTE DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dentin; Glass ionomer cements; Tensile strength; Ultrasonics

Indexed keywords

FUJI GLASS IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJI GLASS-IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJI II LC CEMENT IMPROVED; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC FIL; KETAC MOLAR; KETAC-FIL; KETAC-MOLAR; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHOTAC FIL; PHOTAC-FIL; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALEATES; MATERIALS TESTING; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASONICS; WATER;

EID: 33845917374     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Gee AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of accelerating the setting rate by ultrasound or heat on the bond strength of glass ionomers used as orthodontic bracket cements. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:472-476.
2. Arcoria CJ, Butler JR, Wagner MJ, Vitasek BA. Bending strength of Fuji and Ketac glass ionomers after sonication. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:607-613.
3. Barakat MM, Powers JM. In vitro bond strength of cements to treated teeth. Aust Dent J 1986;31:415-419.
4. Covey DA, Ewoldsen NO. Porosity in manually and machine mixed resinmodified glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent 2001;26:617-623.
5. Fano L, Fano V, Ma WY, Yang GW, Zhu F. Structure of dental glass-ionomer cements by confocal fluorescence: Microscopy and stereomicroscopy. Biomaterials 2001;22:2353-2358.
6. Friedl KH, Powers JM, Hiller KA. Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1995;20:74-80.
7. Ghorayeb SR, Xue T, Lord W. A finite element study of ultrasonic wave propagation in a tooth phantom. J Dent Res 1998;77:39-49.
8. Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Koike T, Yukitani W, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S, et al. Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system. Oper Dent 1999;24:323-330.
9. International Organization for Standardization: Dental water-based cements. Technical Specification ISO/TC 9917:1991.
10. Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RNB, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater 2004;20:45-50.
11. Laird WRE, Walmsley AD. Ultrasound in dentistry. Part 1: Biophysical interactions. J Dent 1991;19:14-17.
12. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1992;71:1836-1841.
13. Mitchell CA, Douglas WH. Comparison of the porosity of hand-mixed and capsulated glass-ionomer luting cements. Biomaterials 1997;18:1127-1131.
14. Palma-Dibb RG, Castro CG, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA. Bond strength of glass ionomer cements to caries affected dentin. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:57-62.
15. Pereira PNR, Yamada T, Tei R, Tagami J. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Am J Dent 1997;10:128-132.
16. Pereira LCC, Nunes MCP, Palma-Dibb RG, Powers JM, Roulet JF, Navarro MFL. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:73-80.
17. Safar JA, Davis RD, Overton JD. Effect of saliva contamination on the bond of dentin to resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Oper Dent 1999;24:351-357.
18. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1998;77:1749-1759.
19. Sidhu SK, Pilecki P, Ping-Chin C, Watson TF. The morphology and stability of resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive at the dentin/resin-based composite interface. Amer J Dent 2002;15:129-136.
20. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners. J Dent 2000;28:361-366.
21. Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SHY, Pashley DH. Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:153-167.
22. Towler MR, Bushby AJ, Billington RW, Hill RG. A preliminary comparison of the mechanical properties of chemically cured and ultrasonically cured glass ionomer cements, using nano-indentation techniques. Biomaterials 2001;22:1401-1406.
23. Towler MR, Crowley CM, Hill RG. Investigation into the ultrasonic setting of glass ionomer cement: Part 1 Postulated Modalities. J Mater Sci Lett 2003;22:539-541.
24. Twomey E, Towler MR, Crowley CM, Doyle J, Hampshire, S. Investigation into the ultrasonic setting of glass ionomer cements. Part M: setting times and compressive strengths. J Mater Sci 2004;39:4631-4632.
25. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000;79:709-714.