Interference with Bottom-Up Feature Detection by Higher-Level Object Recognition

Current Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-31

  Zhaoping, Li ^a   Guyader, Nathalie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

SYSNEURO

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TIME;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33845914571     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.050     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 (1980) 97-136
2. Li Z. A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 9-16
3. Tehovnik E.J., Slocum W.M., and Schiller P.H. Saccadic eye movements evoked by microstimulation of striate cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17 (2003) 870-878
4. Stankiewicz B.J., Hummel J.E., and Cooper E.E. The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: Evidence for a dual representation of object shape. J. Exp. Psychol. 24 (1998) 732-744
5. Treisman A.M., and Kanwisher N.G. Perceiving visually presented objects: Recognition, awareness, and modularity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8 (1998) 218-226
6. Frith U. A curious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema. Percept. Psychophys. 16 (1974) 113-116
7. Hubel D.H., and Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol. 195 (1968) 215-243
8. Kahneman D., Treisman A., and Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognit. Psychol. 24 (1992) 175-219
9. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. How the visual cortex recognizes objects: The tales of the standard model. In: Chalupa L.M., and Werner J.S. (Eds). The Visual Neurosciences Volume 2 (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1640-1653
10. Tanaka K. Inferotemporal response properties. In: Chalupa L.M., and Werner J.S. (Eds). The Visual Neurosciences Volume 2 (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1151-1164
11. Rolls E.T. Invariant object and face recognition. In: Chalupa L.M., and Werner J.S. (Eds). The Visual Neurosciences Volume 2 (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1165-1178
12. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., and Poggio T. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr. Biol. 5 (1995) 552-563
13. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J., and Price C.J. Top-down processes in object identification: Evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol Sci. 352 (1997) 1275-1282
14. Kourtzi Z., and Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293 (2001) 1506-1509
15. Grill-Spector K., Kourtzi Z., and Kanwisher N. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res. 41 (2001) 1409-1422
16. Knierim J.J., and Van Essen D.C. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 67 (1992) 961-980
17. Sillito A.M., Grieve K.L., Jones H.E., Cudeiro J., and Davis J. Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities. Nature 378 (1995) 492-496
18. Nothdurft H.C., Gallant J.L., and Van Essen D.C. Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of "popout" under anesthesia. Vis. Neurosci. 16 (1999) 15-34
19. Schiller P.H., and Lee K. The role of the primate extra-striate area V4 in lesion. Science 251 (1991) 1251-1253
20. Mazer J.A., and Gallant J.L. Goal-related activity in V4 during free viewing visual search: Evidence for a ventral stream visual salience map. Neuron 40 (2003) 1241-1250
21. Ogawa T., and Komatsu H. Target selection in area V4 during a multidimensional visual search task. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 6371-6382
22. Wolfe J.M., and Bennett S.C. Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Res. 37 (1997) 25-43
23. Ungerleider L.G., and Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle D.J., Goodale M.A., and Mansfield R.J.W. (Eds). Analysis of Visual Behavior (1982), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 549-586
24. Chelazzi L., Miller E.K., Duncan J., and Desimone R. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 363 (1993) 345-347
25. Motter B.C. Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 70 (1993) 909-919
26. Hoffman J.E. Visual attention and eye movements. In: Pashler H. (Ed). Attention (1998), University College London Press, London 119-154
27. Duncan J., and Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev. 96 (1989) 433-458
28. Potter M.C. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. J. Exp. Psychol. [Hum. Learn.] 5 (1976) 509-522
29. Thorpe S., Fize D., and Marlot C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381 (1996) 520-522
30. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K., and Shapiro K.L. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 382 (1996) 616-618
31. van Zoest W., and Donk M. Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search. Perception 33 (2004) 927-937
32. Gilchrist I.D., Heywood C.A., and Findlay J.M. Visual sensitivity in search tasks depends on the response requirement. Spat. Vis. 16 (2003) 277-293
33. Fang F., and He S. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1380-1385
34. Enns J.T., and Di Lollo V. What's new in visual masking?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 345-352
35. Frazor R.A., Albrecht D.G., Geisler W.S., and Crane A.M. Visual cortex neurons of monkeys and cats: Temporal dynamics of the spatial frequency response function. J. Neurophysiol. 91 (2004) 2607-2627
36. Li Z. Different retinal ganglion cells have different functional goals. Int. J. Neural Syst. 3 (1992) 237-248
37. Richards J.T., and Reicher G.M. The effect of background familiarity in visual search - An analysis of underlying factors. Percept. Psychophys. 23 (1978) 499-505
38. Shen J., and Reingold E.M. Visual search asymmetry: The influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features. Percept. Psychophys. 63 (2001) 464-475