Housing quality and neighborhood redevelopment: A study of neighborhood initiatives in Phoenix, Arizona

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 23-45

  Dantico, Marilyn ^a   Guhathakurta, Subhrajit ^a   Mushkatel, Alvin ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community block grant; Housing conditions; Neighborhood improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845899659     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01900690601050062     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Local Initiatives Support Corporation. e-Alert Newsletter, March 3, 2005.
2. http://hud.gov/offices/cir/test031402b.cfm Bernardi, R. Statement before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity. Bernardi, R. Statement before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity.
3. Galster, G. and Walker, C. and Hayes, C. and Boxall, P. and Johnson, J. (2004) Measuring the Impact of Community Development Block Grant Spending on Urban Neighborhoods Housing Policy Debate, 15(4), pp. 903-934. http://www.csa.com/htbin/ linkabst.cgi?issn=1051-1482&vol=15&iss=4&firstpage=903
4. Nathan, R. and Dommel, P. and Liebshutz, S. and Morris, M. (1977) Monitoring the Block Grant Program for Community Development Political Science Quarterly, 92, pp. 219-244. http://www.csa.com/htbin/ linkabst.cgi?issn=0032-3195&vol=92&iss=&firstpage=219 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F2148351
5. Mushkatel, Alvin and Judd, Dennis.(1982) Inequality of Urban Services: The Impact of the Community Development Act. In The Politics of Urban Services. (pp. 127-140). San Francisco CA: Lexington Books.
6. Mushkatel, Alvin and Wilson, L. A., II.(1982) The Effects of Geographic Targeting and Programmatic Change: The Denver Community Development Agency. In New Directions for Program Evaluation: Applications of Time Series Analysis to Evaluation. (pp. 49-63). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
7. Rich, M.(1993) Federal Policymaking and the Poor: National Goals, Local Choices, and Distributional Outcomes. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Urban Institute.(1994) Federal Funds, Local Choices: An Evaluation of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
9. Whalley, D. (1988) Neighborhood Variations in Moderate Housing Rehabilitation Program Impacts: An Accounting Model of Housing Quality Change Economic Geography, 64(1), pp. 45-61. http://www.csa.com/htbin/ linkabst.cgi?issn=0013-0095&vol=64&iss=1&firstpage=45 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F143918
10. Richardson, T.(2005) CDBG Formula Targeting to Community Development Need. Washington DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
11. City of Phoenix, Arizona.(2005) History of the Phoenix Community Development Block Grant Program. Phoenix AZ: Neighborhood Service Department.
12. Bleakly, K. and Holin, M. J. and Fitzpatrick, L. and Hodges, L.(1983) A Case Study of Local Control over Housing Development: The Neighborhood Strategy Area Demonstration. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
13. Avent, J.(1995) City Council Report. Subject: Neighborhood Services Initiatives. Phoenix AZ: City Council.
14. http://www.ci.phoenix.az.us/GRANTNSD/cp00vii.html City of Phoenix, Arizona. City of Phoenix Consolidated Plan for 2000-2005; City of Phoenix, Arizona. City of Phoenix Consolidated Plan for 2000-2005