Effective prediction of job processing times in a large-scale grid environment

Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 359-360

  Dobber, Menno ^a   Van Der Mei, Rob ^a   Koole, Ger ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER NETWORKS; MICROPROCESSOR CHIPS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

DYNAMIC EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING (DES); GRID ENVIRONMENT; PREDICTION METHODS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845897134     PISSN: 10828907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. http://www.planet-lab.org.
2. P. A. Dinda and D. R. O'Hallaron. Host load prediction using linear models. Cluster Computing, 3(4):265-280, 2000.
3. A. M. Dobber, G. M. Koole, and R. D. van der Mei. Dynamic load balancing experiments in a grid. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid 2005), pages 123-130. IEEE Press, May 2005.
4. A. M. Dobber, R. D. van der Mei, and G. M. Koole. Statistical properties of task running times in a global-scale grid environment. 2005. Submitted for publication.
5. J. T. Mentzer. Forecasting with adaptive extended exponential smoothing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16:62-70, 1988.
6. S. N. Pantazopoulos and C. P. Pappis. A new adaptive method for extrapolative forecasting algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 94:106-111, 1996.
7. J. W. Taylor. Smooth transition exponential smoothing. Journal of Forecasting, 23:385-404, 2004.
8. D. W. Trigg and A. G. Leach. Exponential smoothing with an adaptive response rate. Operations Research Quarterly, 18:53-59, 1967.
9. D. C. Whybark. Comparison of adaptive forecasting techniques. Logistics Transportation Review, 8:13-26, 1973.
10. R. Wolski. Experiences with predicting resource performance on-line in computational grid settings. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 30(4):41-49, 2003.