Teaching complementary and alternative medicine in a reform curriculum

Forschende Komplementarmedizin

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 342-348

  Witt, C M ^a   Brinkhaus, B ^a   Willich, S ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation; HILVE; Medical education; Needs assessment

Indexed keywords

ACUPUNCTURE; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; CHINESE MEDICINE; CURRICULUM; HOMEOPATHY; HUMAN; HYDROTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 33845897102     PISSN: 16614119     EISSN: 16614127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000097437     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Harris P, Rees R: The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among the general population: a systematic review of the literature. Complement Ther Med 2000;8:88-96.
2. Wootton JC, Sparber A: Survey of complementary and alternative medicine: Part I. General trends and demographic groups. J Altern Complement Med 2001;7(2):195-208.
3. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van-Rompay M, Kessler RC: Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998;280(18):1569-1575.
4. European Commission: COST Action B4 Unconventional Medicine: Final Report of the Management Committee 1993-1998. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1998.
5. Wetzel MS, Eisenberg DM, Kaptchuk TJ: Courses involving complementary and alternative medicine at US medical schools. JAMA 1998;280(9):784-787.
6. Furnham A, McGill C: Medical students' attitudes about complementary and alternative medicine. J Altern Complement Med 2003;9:275-284.
7. Kiessling C, Müller T, Becker-Witt C, Begenau J, Prinz V, Schleiermacher S: A medical humanities special study module on principles of medical theory and practice at the Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany. Acad Med 2003;78(10): 1031-1035.
8. Rindermann H, Amelang M: Das 'Heidelberger Inventar zur Lehrveranstaltungs-Evaluation' (HILVE). Handanweisung. Heidelberg, Asanger, 1994.
9. Kligler B, Maizes V, Schachter S, Park CM, Gaudet T, Benn R, Lee R, Remen RN: Core competencies in integrative medicine for medical school curricula: a proposal. Acad Med 2004;79(6):521-531.
10. Härtel U, Volger E: Inanspruchnahme und Akzeptanz von klassischen Naturheilverfahren und alternativen Heilmethoden in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstudie. Gesundheitswesen 2003;65:A35.
11. Marstedt G, Moebus S: Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes - Inanspruchnahme alternativer Methoden in der Medizin. Berlin, Robert Koch-Institut, 2002.
12. Institut für Demoskopie: Naturheilmittel 2002: Wichtigste Erkenntnisse aus Allenbacher Trendstudien. Allensbach, Institut für Demoskopie, 2002.
13. Müller T, Witt C: Geschichte, Konzepte und aktuelle Anwendung psychotherapeutischer Verfahren: Evaluation eines Wahlpflichtseminars. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2005;22(1):Doc10 (vorläufiges PDF).
14. Brinkhaus B, Joos S, Lindner M, Kohnen R, Witt C, Willich SN, Hahn EG: Integration of complementary and alternative medicine into German medical school curricula - contradictions between the opinions of decision makers and the status quo. Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 2005;12:139-143.
15. Ezzo J, Berman BM, Vickers AJ, Linde K: Complementary medicine and the Cochrane collaboration. JAMA 1998;280(18):1628-1630.
16. Owen DJ, Fang M-LE: Information-seeking behavior in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): an online survey of faculty at a health sciences campus. J Med Libr Assoc 2003;91(3):311-321.
17. Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM: Varieties of healing. 1: Medical pluralism in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:189-195.