Dynamic modelling of an industrial R2R FCC unit

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1184-1198

  Fernandes, Joana L ^a   Verstraete, Jan J ^b   Pinheiro, Carla I C ^a   Oliveira, Nuno M C ^c   Ramôa Ribeiro, Fernando ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Dynamic simulation; Fluid catalytic cracking; Mathematical modelling; Nonlinear dynamics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MASS TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

CATALYST TRANSPORT; FEED FLOW RATE; REGENERATION SYSTEMS;

FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING; MASS TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

EID: 33845889078     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ali H.K.A., and Rohani S. Dynamic modelling and simulation of a riser type fluid catalytic cracking unit. Chemical Engineering Technology 20 2 (1997) 118-130
2. Ancheyta-Juárez J., López-Isunza F., and Aguilar-Rodríguez E. 5-Lump kinetic model for gas oil catalytic cracking. Applied Catalysis A: General 177 (1999) 227-235
3. Arastoopour H., and Gidaspow D. Vertical pneumatic conveying using four hydrodynamic models. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 18 (1979) 123-130
4. Arbel A., Huang Z., Rinard I.H., and Shinnar R. Dynamic and control of fluidized catalytic crackers. 1. Modeling of the current generation of FCC's. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 34 (1995) 1228-1243
5. Arbel A., Rinard I.H., Shinnar R., and Sapre A.V. Dynamic and control of fluidized catalytic crackers. 2. Multiple steady states and instabilities. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 34 (1995) 3014-3026
6. Arthur J.R. Reactions between carbon and oxygen. Transactions of the Faraday Society 47 (1951) 164-178
7. Brent R.P. An algorithm with guaranteed convergence for finding a zero of a function. The Computer Journal 14 (1971) 422-425
8. Carabineiro H., Pinheiro C.I.C., Lemos F., and Ramôa Ribeiro F. Transient microkinetic modelling of n-heptane catalytic cracking over H-USY zeolite. Chemical Engineering Science 59 (2004) 1221-1232
9. Christensen G., Apelia M.E., Hickey K.J., and Jaffe S.B. Future directions in modelling the FCC process: an emphasis on product quality. Chemical Engineering Science 54 (1999) 2753-2764
10. Corella, J., Frances, E., 1991. Analysis of the riser reactor of a fluid cracking unit: model based on kinetics of cracking and deactivation from laboratory tests. In: Occelli, M.L. (Ed.), Fluid Catalytic Cracking-II: Concepts in Catalyst Design. ACS Symposium Series, vol. 452, pp. 165-182.
11. Daly, C., Tidjani, N., Martin, G., Roesler, J., 2001. Détermination des paramétres cinétiques dans la régénération des catalyseurs de FCC. Technical Report No. 56010, Institut Français du Pétrole.
12. Das A.K., Baudrez E., Marin G.B., and Heynderickx G.J. Three-dimensional simulation of a fluid catalytic cracking riser reactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 42 (2003) 2602-2617
13. De Lasa H.I., and Grace J.R. The influence of the freeboard region in a fluidized bed catalytic cracking regenerator. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 6 6 (1979) 984-991
14. Dean R.R., Mauleon J.L., and Letzsch W.S. New resid cracker (part 1). Oil Gas Journal 80 40 (1982) 75-80
15. Dean R.R., Mauleon J.L., and Letzsch W.S. New resid cracker (part 2). Oil Gas Journal 80 41 (1982) 168-176
16. Elnashaie S.S.E.H., Mohamed N.F., and Kamal M. Simulation and static bifurcation behavior of industrial FCC units. Chemical Engineering Communications 191 (2004) 813-831
17. Errazu A.F., De Lasa H.I., and Sarti F. A fluidized bed catalytic cracking regenerator model grid effects. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 57 April (1979) 191-197
18. Faltsi-Saravelou O., and Vasalos I.A. FBSim: A model for fluidized bed simulation-II. Simulation of an industrial fluidized catalytic cracking regenerator. Computers & Chemical Engineering 15 9 (1991) 647-656
19. Fligner M., Schipper P.H., Sapre A.V., and Krambeck F.J. Two phase cluster model in riser reactors: impact of radial density distributions on yields. Chemical Engineering Science 49 24B (1994) 5813-5818
20. Gauthier T., Bayle J., and Leroy P. FCC: Fluidization phenomena and technologies. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Rev. IFP 55 2 (2000) 187-207
21. Hagelberg P., Eilos I., Hiltunen J., Lipiäinen K., Niemi V.M., Aittamaa J., and Krause A.O.I. Kinetics of catalytic cracking with short contact times. Applied Catalysis A: General 223 (2002) 73-84
22. Han I.-S., and Chung C.-B. Dynamic modelling and simulation of a fluidized catalytic cracking process. Part I: process modeling. Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 1951-1971
23. Han I.-S., and Chung C.-B. Dynamic modelling and simulation of a fluidized catalytic cracking process. Part II: property estimation and simulation. Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 1973-1990
24. Hindmarsh A.C. LSODE and LSODI. Two initial value ordinary differential equation solvers. ACM-SIGNUM Newslett. 15 (1980) 10-11
25. Jacob S., Gross B., Voltz S.E., and Weekman Jr. V.W. A lumping and reaction scheme for catalytic cracking. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 22 4 (1976) 701-713
26. Kunii D., and Levenspiel O. Fluidized reactor models. 1. For bubbling beds of fine, intermediate and large particles 2. For the lean phase: freeboard and fast fluidization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 29 (1990) 1226-1234
27. Letzsch W., and Jackson G. Residual cracking for the pacific rim. World Refining 24 6 (2004) 42-45
28. Li, S., Petzold, L., 1999. Design of new DASPK for sensitivity analysis. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, University of California Santa Barbara.
29. Malay P., Milne B.J., and Rohani S. The modified dynamic model of a riser type fluid catalytic cracking unit. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 77 February (1999) 169-179
30. Marcilly C.R., and Bonifay R.R. Catalytic cracking of resid feedstocks. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 21 4B (1996) 627-651
31. McFarlane R.C., Reineman R.C., Bartee J.F., and Georgakis C. Dynamic simulator for a model IV fluid catalytic cracking unit. Computers Chemical Engineering 17 3 (1993) 275-300
32. Montgomery, J.A., 1993. The Grace Davison Guide to Fluid Catalytic Cracking. Part One. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
33. Morley K., and De Lasa H.I. Regeneration of cracking catalyst influence of the homogeneous CO postcombustion reaction. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 66 June (1988) 428-432
34. Moustafa T.M., and Froment G.F. Kinetic modelling of coke formation and deactivation in the catalytic cracking of vacuum gas oil. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 42 (2003) 14-25
35. Pärssinen, J.H., 2002. Hydrodynamics of low-flux and high-flux circulating fluidized beds. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mechanical Engineering Series, No. 161, Finnish Academies of Technology, 119pp.
36. Pinheiro C.I.C., Lemos F., and Ramôa Ribeiro F. Dynamic modelling and network simulation of n-heptane catalytic cracking: influence of kinetic parameters. Chemical Engineering Science 54 (1999) 1735-1750
37. Pitault I., Nevicato D., Forissier M., and Bernard J.-R. Kinetic model based on a molecular description for catalytic cracking of vacuum gas oil. Chemical Engineering Science 49 (1994) 4249-4262
38. Pugsley T.S., and Berruti F. A predictive hydrodynamic model or circulating fluidized bed risers. Powder Technology 89 (1996) 57-69
39. Quann R.J., and Jaffe S.B. Structure oriented lumping: describing the chemistry of complex hydrocarbon mixtures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 31 (1992) 2483-2497
40. Quann R.J., and Jaffe S.B. Building useful models of complex reaction systems in petroleum refining. Chemical Engineering Science 51 (1996) 1615-1635
41. Radhakrishnan, K., Hindmarsh, A.C., 1993. Description and use of LSODE, the livermore solver for ordinary differential equations. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-ID-113855.
42. Rowe P.N., and Henwood G.A. Drag forces in a hydraulic model of a fluidised bed-part 1. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers 39 (1961) 43-54
43. Sabbaghan H., Sotudeh-Gharebagh R., and Mostoufi N. Modelling the acceleration zone in the riser of circulating fluidized beds. Powder Technology 142 (2004) 129-135
44. Secchi A.R., Santos M.G., Neumann G.A., and Trierweiler J.O. A dynamic model for a FCC UOP stacked converter unit. Computers & Chemical Engineering 25 4-6 (2001) 851-858
45. Takatsuka T., Sato S., Morimoto Y., and Hashimoto H. A reaction model for fluidized-bed catalytic cracking of residual oil. International Chemical Engineering 27 (1987) 107-115
46. Vale, H., 2002. Development of a simulator for a complete R2R catalytic cracking unit. Technical Report, Institut Français du Pétrole.
47. Wang G., Lin S., Mo W., Peng C., and Yang G. Kinetics of combustion of carbon and hydrogen in carbonaceous deposits on zeolite-type cracking catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 25 3 (1986) 626-630
48. Weekman Jr. V.W., and Nace D.M. Kinetics of catalytic cracking selectivity in fixed, moving, and fluid bed reactors. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 16 3 (1970) 397-404
49. 2/CO product ratio. Journal of Catalysis 6 (1966) 425-430
50. Xu G., and Kato K. Hydrodynamic equivalent diameter for clusters in heterogeneous gas-solid flow. Chemical Engineering Science 54 (1999) 1837-1847
51. Xu G., and Li J. Analytical solution of the energy-minimization multi-scale model for gas-solid two-phase flow. Chemical Engineering Science 53 (1998) 1349-1366
52. Zwinkels, M., Nougier, L., 1997. FCC regenerator simulation model. Technical Report No. 44143, Institut Français du Pétrole.