A study on textual entailment

Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 326-333

  Rus, Vasile ^a   Graesser, Art ^a   McCarthy, Philip M ^a   Lin, King Ip ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPH-BASED APPROACH; HYPOTHESIS-GRAPH; LEXICOSYNTACTIC CONTEXT; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

COMPUTATION THEORY; DECISION MAKING; MAPPING; SYNTACTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 33845876308     PISSN: 10823409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICTAI.2005.18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. E. Charniak. Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, 1997.
2. E. Charniak. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the North-American Chapter of Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, Washington, 2000.
3. I. Dagan and O. Glickman. Probabilistic textual entailment: Generic applied modeling of language variability. In Proceedings of Learning Methods for Text Understanding and Mining, Grenoble, France, January 26-29 2004.
4. I. Dagan, O. Glickman, and B. Magnini. Recognizing textual entailment. In http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE, 2004-2005.
5. I. Dagan, O. Glickman, and B. Magnini. The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the Recognizing Textual Entaiment Challenge Workshop, Southampton, U.K., April 11-13 2005.
6. A. Graesser, S. Lu, G. Jackson, Mitchell, H., M. Ventura, A. Olney, and M. Louwerse. Autotutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, pages 180-193, 2004.
7. A. Graesser, K. VanLehn, C. Rose, P. Jordan, and D. Harter. Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine, 22:39-51, 2001.
8. D. Magerman. Natural Language Parsing as Statistical Pattern Recognition. PhD thesis, Stanford University, February 1994.
9. I. Mel'cuk. Dependency Syntax: theory and practice. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1998.
10. G. Miller. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39-41, 1995.
11. D. Moldovan and V. Rus. Logic form transformation of wordNet and its applicability to question answering. In Proceedings of the ACL Conference (ACL-2001), Toulouse, France, July 2001.
12. C. Monz and M. de Rijke. Light-Weight Entailment Checking for Computational Semantics, pages 59-72. 2001.
13. M. Pazienza, M. Pennacchiotti, and F. Zanzotto. Textual entailment as syntactic graph distance: A rule based and svm based approach. In Proceedings of the Recognizing Textual Entaiment Challenge Workshop, Southampton, U.K., April 11-13 2005.
14. V. Rus and K. Desai. Assigning function tags with a simple model. In Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing) 2005, Mexico City, Mexico 2005.
15. S. Skiena. The Algorithm Design Manual. Springer-Verlag, 1998.