Absence of iatrogenic or contagion effects in adolescent group therapy: Findings from the Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) study

American Journal on Addictions

Volumn 15, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages s4-s15

  Burleson, Joseph A ^a   Kaminer, Yifrah ^a   Dennis, Michael L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^b CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CHILD BEHAVIOR; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FAMILY THERAPY; FEMALE; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SOCIAL PROBLEM; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845864729     PISSN: 10550496     EISSN: 15210391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10550490601003656     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Dishion TJ, McCord J, Poulin F. When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. Am Psych. 1999;54:755-764.
2. Drug Strategies. Treating teens: A guide to adolescent drug programs. 2003; Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved on 4/6/06 from http://www.drugstrategies.org/teens/index.html.
3. Gifford-Smith M, Dodge KA, Dishion TJ, McCord J. Peer influences in children and adolescents crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. J Ab Child Psych. 2005;33:255-265.
4. Hoag MJ, Burlingame GM. Evaluating the effectiveness of child and adolescent group treatment: A meta-analytic review. J Clin Child Psych. 1997;26:236-246.
5. Powers E, Witmer H. An Experiment in the Prevention of Delinquency: The Cambridge-Somerville Youth Study. New York: Columbia University Press; 1951.
6. McCord J. A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. Am Psychologist. 1978;33:284-289.
7. Dishion TJ, Poulin F, Barraston B. Peer group dynamics associated with iatrogenic effects in group interventions with high-risk young adolescents. New Direct Child Adolesc Dev. 2002:91:79-92.
8. Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE, Valente E. Social information processing pattern partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. J Ab Psych. 1995;104:632-643.
9. Poulin F, Dishion TJ, Burraston B. 3-year iatrogenic effects associated with aggregating high-risk adolescents in cognitive-behavioral preventive interventions. Appl Develop Sci. 2001;5:214-224.
10. Dishion TJ, Andrews DW, Crosby L. Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Dev. 1995;66:139-151.
11. Poulin F, Dishion TJ, Haas E. The peer influence paradox: relationship quality and deviancy training within male adolescent friendship. Merrill-Palmer Quart. 1999;45:42-61.
12. Dishion TJ, Dodge KA. Peer contagion in interventions for children and adolescents: moving toward an understanding of the ecology and dynamics of change. J Ab Child Psych. 2005;33:395-400.
13. Feldman RA, Caplinger TE, Wodarski JS. The St. Louis Conundrum: The Effective Treatment of Antisocial Youths. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1993.
14. Mahoney JL, Stattin H, Lord H. Unstructured youth recreation centre participation and antisocial behavior development: Selection influences and the moderating role of antisocial peers. Intl J Behav Dev. 2004;28:553-560.
15. Ang RP, Hughes JN. Differential benefits of skills training with antisocial youth based on group composition: A meta-analytic investigation. Schl Psyc Rev. 2001;31:164-185.
16. Weiss B, Caron A, Ball S, Tapp J, Johnson M, Weisz JR. Iatrogenic effects of group treatment for antisocial youth. J Cons Clin Psych. 2005;73:1036-1044.
17. Sukhodolsky DN, Kassinove H, Gorman BS. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Aggr and Violent Behav. 2004;9:247-269.
18. Lipsey M. The effects of community-based group treatment for delinquency: A meta-analytic search for cross-study generalizations. In: Dodge K, Dishion T, eds. Deviant by Design: Interventions and Policies that Aggregate Deviant Youth and Strategies to Optimize Outcomes. New York: Guilford; 2006:162-184.
19. Kaminer Y, Burleson JA, Blitz C. Psychotherapies for adolescent substance abusers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:684-690.
20. Winters KC, Stinchfield RD, Opland E. The effectiveness of the Minnesota Model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. Addiction. 2000;95:601-612.
21. Waldron HB, Slesnick N, Brody JL, Turner CW. Four-, and seven-month treatment outcomes for adolescent substance-abuse. J Cons Clin Psych. 2001;62:802-813.
22. Kaminer Y, Burleson JA, Goldberger R. Psychotherapies for adolescent substance abusers: short-and long-term outcomes. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190:737-745.
23. Dennis ML, Godley SH, Diamond G, et al. Main findings of The Cannabis Youth Treatment randomized field experiment. J Sub Abuse Trt. 2004;27:197-213.
24. Battjes RJ, Gordon MS, O'Grady KE, et al. Evaluation of a group-based substance abuse treatment program for adolescents. J Sub Abuse Trt. 2004:27:123-134.
25. French MT, Roebuck MC, Dennis ML, et al. The economic cost of outpatient marijuana treatment for adolescents: findings from a multi-site field experiment. Addiction. 2002;97,Suppl 1:84-97.
26. Myers MG, Brown SA. The adolescent relapse coping questionnaire: psychometric validation. J Studies Alc. 1996;57:40-46.
27. Brown SA, D'Amico EJ. Treating adolescents together or individually? Issues in adolescent substance abuse interventions. In: O'Leary TA, Brown SA, Colby SK, et al. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:890-899.
28. Petrocelli JV. Effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioral therapy for general symptomatology: A meta-analysis. J Specialists in Group Work. 2002;27:92-115.
29. Berger RJ, Crowley JE, Gold M, Gray J, Arnold MS. Experiment in Juvenile Court: A Study of a Program of Volunteers Working with Juvenile Probationers. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research; 1975.
30. Gottfredson GC. Peer group interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior: a selective review and a new evaluation. Criminology. 1987;25:671-714.
31. McCord J, Widom CS, Crowell NA. Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
32. Lipsey MW. Juvenile delinquency treatment: a meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In: Cook TD, Cooper H, Cordray DS, et al, eds. Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1992:83-127.
33. Dennis ML, Titus JC, Diamond G, et al. The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) experiment: Rationale, study design, and analysis plans. Addiction. 2002;97:S16-S34.
34. Tims FM, Dennis ML, Hamilton N, et al. Characteristics and problems of 600 adolescent cannabis abusers in outpatient treatment. Addiction. 2002;97:S46-S57.
35. Diamond GS, Godley SH, Liddle HA, et al. Five outpatient treatment models for adolescent marijuana use: A description of the cannabis youth treatment interventions. Addiction. 2005;97:S70-S83.
36. French MT, Roebuck MC, Dennis ML, et al. Outpatient marijuana treatment for adolescents: Economic evaluation of a multisite field experiment. Evaluation Review. 2003;27:421-459.
37. Sampl S, Kadden R. Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET-CBT-5) for Adolescent Cannabis Users. Farmington, CT: University of Connecticut School of Medicine; 1998.
38. Webb C, Scudder M, Kaminer Y, eds. The MCBT5 Supplement: 7 sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT7) for Adolescent Cannabis Users. Farmington, CT: University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Alcohol Research Center; 1998.
39. Bunch L, Hamilton N, Tims F, Angelovich N, McDougall B. CYT: A Multi-Site Study of the Effectiveness of Treatment for Cannabis Dependent Youth: Family Support Network. St. Petersburg, FL: Operation PAR, Inc; 1998.
40. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment for Substance-Related Disorders (2nd ed.). Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine; 2001.
41. Dennis ML, Titus JC, White M, Unsicker J, Hodgkins D. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Administration Guide for the GAIN and Related Measures. (Version 5 ed.). Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 2003. Retrived on 4/6/06 from www.chestnut.org/li/gain.
42. Shane P, Jasiukaitis P, Green RS. Treatment outcomes among adolescents with substance abuse problems: The relationship between comorbidities and post-treatment substance involvement. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2003;26:393-402.
43. SPSS, Inc. SPSS Version 12.0.0. 2003; Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
44. Hintze J. NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. Kaysville, Utah; 2001, www.ncss.com.
45. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
46. Arnold MG, Hughes JN. First do no harm: Adverse effects of grouping deviant youth for skills training. J Schl Psych. 2000;37:99-115.
47. Dodge KA. Cost effectiveness of psychotherapy for child aggression: first, is there cost-effectiveness? Group Dynamics: Theory, Res & Prac. 1999;3:275-278.
48. Kaminer Y. Challenges and opportunities of group therapy for adolescent substance abuse: A critical review. Addict Behav. 2005;30:1765-1774.
49. Angelovich N, Karvinen T, Panichelli-Mindel S, et al. The Clinical Management of a Multi-Site Field Trial of Five Outpatient Treatments for Adolescent Substance Abuse. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2001.
50. Eccles JS, Gootman JA. Community Programs to Promote Youth Development. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, Board on Children, Youth, and Families. Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.