Feedback control for communication with non-orthogonal states

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 7, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 127-138

  Jacobs, Kurt ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK CONTROL;

CLASSICAL INFORMATION; CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENTS; INFORMATION GAIN; INITIAL PREPARATION; NON-ORTHOGONAL; OPTIMAL MEASUREMENTS; QUANTUM MECHANICAL; QUANTUM SYSTEM;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 33845805934     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. C. King, M.B. Ruskai, J. Math. Phys. 42, 87-98 (2001).
2. P. Hausladen, R. Jozsa, B. Schumacher, M. Westmorland and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1869 (1996).
3. A.S. Holevo, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 44 269 (1998).
4. B. Schumacher, M. Westmorland Phys. Rev. A 56 131 (1997).
5. A review of quantum state discrimination is given in A. Chefles, Contemporary Phys. 41, 401 (2000).
6. see, e.g. I. D. Ivanovic, Phys. Lett. A 123 257 (1987);
7. Y. Sun, J. A. Bergou, M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032315 (2002);
8. Yonina C. Eldar, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 49, 446 (2003);
9. T. Rudolph, R. W. Spekkens, P. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. A 68, 010301(R) (2003).
10. L.B. Levitin, Optimal Quantum Measurements for Two Pure and Mixed States, in: Quantum Communications and Measurement, V.P. Belavkin, O. Hirota, and R. L. Hudson, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1995).
11. C.A. Fuchs and C.M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett, bf 73, 3047 (1994).
12. C.A. Fuchs, Distinguishablity and Accessible Information in Quantum Theory, PhD Thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (1996).
13. A good introduction to continuous quantum measurement is given in [11]. Other recent treatments of continuous measurements of Hermitian operators are given in [12, 13], where the first uses the results of optical continuous measurements in [14, 15]. The stochastic master equation describing a continuous measurement was first derived by Belavkin in [16], and a selection of the early work on continuous measurement is given in references [17, 18, 19].
14. T. A. Brun, Am. J. Phys. 70, 719 (2002).
15. A. C. Doherty and K. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. A 60, 2700 (1999).
16. A. N. Korotkov, Phys.Rev.B 63, 115403 (2001).
17. H. J. Carmichael, S. Singh, R. Vyas and P. R. Rice, Phys. Rev. A, 39, 1200 (1989);
18. H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993).
19. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A 47, 642 (1993).
20. V. P. Belavkin, in Information Complexity and Control in Quantum Physics, edited by A. Blaqui'ere, S. Diner,and G. Lochak (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987).
21. V. P. Belavkin and P. Staszewski, Phys. Lett. A 40, 359 (1989).
22. L. Diosi, Phys. Lett. 114A, 451 (1986);
23. Diosi, Phys. Lett. 132A, 233 (1988).
24. A. Barchielli, J. Phys A: Math. Gen. 20, 6341 (1987).
25. V. P. Belavkin, Nondemolition measurements, nonlinear filtering and dynamic programming of non-linear stochastic processes. In A. Blaquiere (ed.), Modelling and control of systems, Lect. Notes in Control and Information Sciences 121, (Springer, Berlin, 1988) pp. 245-265.
26. V. P. Belavkin, Nondemolition stochastic calculus in Fock space and nonlinear filtering and control in quantum systems , in Proceedings XXIV Karpacz winter school, ser. Stochastic methods in mathematics and physics, R. Guelerak and W. Karwowski, Eds. World Scientific, Singapore, 1988, pp.310324.
27. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 548 (1993);
28. H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2133 (1994).
29. M. Yanagisawa and H. Kimura, in Learning, Control and Hybrid Systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences Vol.241, 294 (Springer-Verlag, 1998).
30. A. C. Doherty, S. Habib, K. Jacobs, H. Mabuchi and S. M. Tan, Phys. Rev. A 62, 012105 (2000).
31. K. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. A 67, 030301(R) (2003).
32. M.R. James, Phys. Rev. A, 69, 032108 (2004).
33. J. K. Stockton, JM Geremia, A. C. Doherty, H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. A 69, 032109 (2004).
34. L. Bouten, S. Edwards and V. P. Belavkin, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, 151 (2005).
35. J. Combes and K. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010504 (2006).
36. C. D'Helon, M.R. James, 'Stability, Gain, and Robustness in Quantum Feedback Networks, Eprint: quant-ph/0511140.
37. S. Dolinar, Tech. Rep. 111, Research Laboratory of Electronics (MIT, Cambridge, 1973).
38. J. Geremia, Phys. Rev. A 70, 062303 (2004).
39. H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4587 (1995);
40. H. M. Wiseman and R. B. Killip, Phys. Rev. A 56, 944 (1997);
41. ibid., Phys. Rev. A 57, 2169 (1998);
42. W. Berry and H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. 63, 013813 (2001);
43. ibid., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5098 (2000);
44. W. Berry and H. M. Wiseman and J. K. Breslin, Phys. Rev. A 63, 053804 (2001).
45. D. W. Berry and H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. A 65, 043803 (2002).
46. D. T. Pope, H. M. Wiseman, and N. K. Langford, Phys. Rev. A 70, 043812 (2004).
47. D. T. Gilespie, Am. J. Phys. 64, 225 (1996).
48. A.N. Korotkov, Phys. Rev. B 60, 5737 (1999);
49. 115403 (2001);
50. R. Ruskov and A.N. Korotkov, Phys. Rev. B 66, 041401 (2002).
51. T. Bayes, An Essay Towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 330 (1763);
52. or see, e.g. S.J. Press, Bayesian statistics : principles, models, and applications (Wiley, New York, 1989).
53. P. Goetsch, and R. Graham, Phys. Rev. A 50, 5242 (1994).
54. K. Jacobs and P.L. Knight, Phys Rev. A 57, 2301 (1998).