A psychological cultural approach to VR experiences

PsychNology Journal

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 331-342

  Ruggeroni, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Cultural artifact; Presence; Psychological processes; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845805453     PISSN: 17207525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Biocca, F. (1996). What does it mean for consciousness to feel 'presence' within virtual reality? Abstract de la Conferencia Towards a Science of Conscioussnes. University of Arizona, Tucson II, USA.
2. Biocca, F., Burgoon, J., Harms, C. and Stoner, M. (2001). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Media Interface and Network Design (M.I.N.D.) Labs. Dept. of Telecommunication, Michigan State University. www.mindlab.org.
3. Cole, M. (1999). Psicología Cultural. Madrid.
4. Cronin, P. (2000). Report on the application of virtual reality technology to education. University of Edinburgh.
5. Gaddis, T. (1995). Virtual reality in the school. Virtual reality and Education laboratory. East Carolina University. http://www.coe.ecu.edu/vr/vrits/1-2gadd1.htm.
6. Heeter, C. (1992). Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence. Presence, 1 (2), 262-71.
7. Knapp, D. (1998). The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Department of Psychology. University of Washington. Presence, 7 (2), 129-143. MIT press. USA.
8. Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of telepresence. Department of Broadcasting, Telecommunications & Mass Media. Temple University. http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
9. Mantovani, G. and Riva, G. (1999). "Real" Presence: How Different Ontlologies Generate Different Criteria for Presence, Telepresence, and Virtual Presence. Presence, 8 (5), 540-50.