Game-theoretic modeling and control of military air operations with civilian players

Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2006

Volumn 5, Issue , 2006, Pages 2932-2940

  Wei, Mo ^a   Chen, Genshe ^b,c   Cruz Jr , Jose B ^a   Kwan, Chiman ^b   Kruger, Martin ^d  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION INC   (United States)

^c AIAA   (United States)

^d OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MILITARY OPERATIONS; STATE SPACE METHODS;

GAME MODEL; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; STATE VARIABLES;

GAME THEORY;

EID: 33845790112     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-6425     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Brackney, H., "The dynamics of military combat", Operations Research, Vol. 7, pp. 30-49, 1959.
2. Taylor, J. G., "Force-on-force attrition modeling", The Military Operations Research Society, 1980.
3. Hughes, W. P., Jr., (Ed.), Military modeling, The Military Operations Research Society, 1984.
4. Battilega, J. A., and Grange, J. K. (Eds.), The military applications of modeling, Washington, DC: Air Force Institute of Technology Press, 1984.
5. Dupuy, T. N., Attrition: Forecasting battle casualties and equipment losses in modern war, Fairfax, VA: Hero Books, 1990.
6. Kott, A., Ground, L., and Langston, J., "Estimation of battlefield attrition in a course of action analysis decision support system", Presented at The Military Operations Research Society Workshop on Land and Expeditionary Warfare, June 1999.
7. rd ed., (Education Series), New York: AIAA, 2000.
8. Lanchester, F. A., Aircraft in warfare: The dawn of the fourth arm, London: Constable, pp. 39-46, 1916.
9. Taylor, J. G., Lanchester models of warfare, Operation Research Society of America, Arlington, VA, 1983.
10. Helmbold, R. L., "A modification of Lanchester's equations", Operations Research, 13, pp. 857-859, 1965.
11. Athans, M., and Falb, O. L., Optimal Control, New York: Mcgraw Hill, 1966.
12. Starr, A. W., and Ho, Y. C., "Nonzero-sum differential games", Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 3,3, pp. 184-206, 1969.
13. Simaan, M., and Cruz, J. B., Jr., "On the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero sum games", Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 11, 5, pp. 533-555, 1973.
14. Cruz, J. B., Jr., and Simaan, M. A., "Multi-agent control strategies with incentives", Proceedings of the First DARPA/JFACC Symposium on Advances in Enterprise Control, San Diego, CA, Nov. 15-18, pp. 177-182, 1999.
15. Nash, J. F., Jr., "Equilibrium points in N-person games", Proceedings of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 36, pp. 48-59, 1950.
16. Cruz, J. B., Jr., Simaan, M. A., Gacic, A., Jiang, H., Letellier, B., Li, M., and Liu, Y., "Game-Theoretic Modeling and Control of a Military Air Operation", IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 37, No. 4, October, 2001.
17. Brooks, H., DeKeyser, T., Jaskot, D., Sibert, D., Sledd, R., Stilwell, W., and Scherer, W., "Using agent-based simulation to reduce collateral damage during military operations", Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, pp. 71-77, 2004.
18. Foster, K.R., and Lerch, I.A., "Collateral damage: American science and the war on terrorism", Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 43-53, 2005.
19. Toedtmann, B., Riebach, S., and Rathgeb, E.P., "The Honeynet quarantine: Reducing collateral damage caused by early intrusion response", Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) Information Assurance Workshop, Proceedings from the Sixth Annual IEEE, pp. 464-465, 2005.
20. Cruz, J. B., Jr., Chen, G., Garagic D., Tan, X., Li, D., Shen, D., Wei, M., Wang, X., "Team dynamics and tactics for mission planning," Proceedings, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3579-3584, December 2003.