Objectives, techniques and valuation of state-owned companies in privatization processes

Public Management Review

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 177-196

  Antonio Gonzalo, José ^a   Pina, Vicente ^b   Torres, Lourdes ^a  

^a Facultad de Económicas y Empresariales ^*  (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

New public management; Privatization public utilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845783802     PISSN: 14719037     EISSN: 14719045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1461667032000066408     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Becker, G. S. (1983) ‘ATheory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3) pp. 371-400.
2. P.329-47.
3. Bel i Queralt, G. (1996) Privatizacion, Desregulaciony Competencia?, Madrid: Civitas.
4. Dombergcr, G. and Pigott, J. (1994) ‘Privatisation Policies and Public Enterprise: A Survey’. The Economic Record, 62 (2) June p. 77.
5. European Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (EUROSAI) (1992) Seminar on The Audit of Privatizations, Prague.
6. European Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (EUROSAI) (1994) Seminar on The Audit of Privatizations, London.
7. European Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (EUROSAI) (1995) Seminar on The Audit of Privatizations, Ankara.
8. Howe, G. (1981) Privatization: The Way Ahead, Conservative Political Centre.
9. International Consortium on Governmental Financial Management (1996) Study on Financial Management Aspects of Privatization, Washington, DC: International Consortium on Governmental Financial Management.
10. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) (1994) Working Group on the Audit of Privatization, London: INTOSAI.
11. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) (1995) Working Group on the Audit of Privatization, Ankara: INTOSAI.
12. Jenkinson, T. (1992) ‘Privatisations’. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance. Macmillan Press Limited, London.
13. Peltzman, S. (1976) ‘Towards a More General Theory of Regulation’. Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2) pp. 211-40.
14. P.335-58.
15. Posner, R. (1975) ‘The Social Cost of Monopoly and Regulation’. Journal of Political Economy, 83(4) pp. 807-27.
16. Saunder, P. and Harris, C. (1994) Privatisation and Popular Capitalism, Buckingham: Open University Press.
17. Stigler, G. S. (1971) ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1) pp. 1-21.
18. Stigler, G. S.ed. (1988) Chicago Studies in Political Economy, Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
19. Torres, L. and Pina, V. (1999) ‘An Empirical Study on the Performance of Supreme Audit Institutions in European Union Privatizations’. European Accounting Review, 8:4 pp. 777-96.
20. Union Europcen des Experts Comptablcs (UEC) (1961) Valoracion de Empresasy Partes de Empresa, Bilbao: Dcusto, Spanish version 1962.
21. Union Europcen des Experts Comptablcs (UEC) (1980) ‘Procedure to Be Followed by Accountants in Valuing an Undertaking as a Going Concern’. Statement No. 1 from the UEC Technical and Research Committee, December.
22. United Nations. Transnational Corporations and Management Division. Department of Economic and Social Development (1993) International Accounting and Reporting Issues, 1992 Review, New York: United Nations Publication ST/CTC/147.
23. Yarrow, G. (1986) ‘Privatisation in Theory and Practice’. Economic Policy.
24. Weston, J. F. and Copeland, T. E. (1992) Finance in Administration, McGraw Hill, London and New York.