Effectiveness of hybrid green's function method in the simulation of near-field strong motion: An application to the 2004 parkfield earthquake

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 96, Issue 4 B, 2006, Pages

  Mena, Banu ^a,b   Durukal, Eser ^b   Erdik, Mustafa ^b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOLOGY; GREEN'S FUNCTION; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; NUMERICAL METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SOILS; EARTHQUAKES; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; TECTONICS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

EARTHQUAKE SYNTHETICS; FREQUENCY MOTION; PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKES; SOIL SITE SIMULATIONS; NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION; NEAR-FIELD STRONG MOTION;

EARTHQUAKES; SEISMOLOGY;

EARTHQUAKE EVENT; FAULT ZONE; GREEN FUNCTION; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKE 2004; ROCK MECHANICS; SITE EFFECT; SOIL DYNAMICS; STRONG MOTION; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FAULT; SIMULATION; STOCHASTICITY;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; PARKFIELD; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845777147     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120050814     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Beresnev, I. (2002). Nonlinearity at California generic soil sites from modeling recent strong motion data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 863-870.
2. Boore, D. M. (1983). Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1865-1894.
3. Boore, D. M. (2003). Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method, Pure Appl. Geophys. 160, 635-676.
4. Boore, D. M., and J. Boatwright (1984). Average body-wave radiation coefficients, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, no. 5, 1615-1621.
5. Boore, D. M., and W. B. Joyner (1997). Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 327-341.
6. Borcherdt, R. D. (1970). Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 60, no. 1, 29-61.
7. Bouchon, M. (1979). Discrete wave number representation of elastic wave fields in three-space dimensions, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 3609-3614.
8. Bouchon, M. A. (1981). Simple method to calculate Green's functions for elastic layered media, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 959-971.
9. COSMOS (2006). http://db.cosmos-eq.org/scripts/events.plx?evt = 941 (last accessed July 2006).
10. Dreger, D. (2004). Preliminary Slip Model, www.cisn.org/special/evt.04. 09.28/finite.dreger.html (last accessed July 2006).
11. Durukal, E., and Y. Çatalyürekli (2004). Spectral analysis of source parameters of the 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce earthquake aftershock sequences, in Proc. of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1-6 August 2004.
12. Durukal, E., A. S. Gunduz, B. Sanli, M. Sorensen, S. Richwalski, K. Sesetyan, K. Atakan, R. Madariaga, and R. Wang (2006). A 'bench-marking' exercise on the performance of kinematic ground motion simulation codes, A-1043 poster presentation, European Geosciences Union (EGU) General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 2-7 April 2006.
13. Hanks, T. C., and H. Kanamori (1979). A moment magnitude scale, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2348-2350.
14. Hartzell, S. H. (1978). Earthquake aftershocks as Green's functions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, 1-4.
15. Irikura, K. (1986). Prediction of strong acceleration motions using empirical Green's function, in Proc. 7th Japan Earthq. Eng. Symp. 151-156, Tokyo, Japan, 10-12 December 1986.
16. Irikura, K., and K. Kamae (1994). Estimation of strong ground motion in broad-frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an empirical Green's function technique, Annali di Geofisica xxxvii, no. 6, 1721-1743.
17. w 5.9) Parkfield Earthquake (Single-Plane Model), www.gps.caltech.edu/~jichen/parkfield/ parkfield.htm/(last accessed July 2006).
18. Kamae, K., K. Irikura, and A. Pitarka (1998). A technique for simulating strong ground motion using hybrid Green's function, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 357-367.
19. Kanamori, H., and D. L. Anderson (1975). Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 1073-1095.
20. Langbein, J., R. Borcherdt, D. Dreger, J. Fletcher, J. L. Hardebeck, M. Hellweg, C. Ji, M. Johnston, J. R. Murray, R. Nadeau, M. J. Rymer, and J. A. Treiman (2005). Preliminary report on the 28 September 2004, M 6.0 Parkfield, California Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 76, 10-25.
21. Lees, J. M., and P. E. Malin (1990). Tomographic images of P wave velocity variation at Parkfield, California, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 21, 793-21,804.
22. McJunkin, R. D., and A. F. Shakal (1983). The Parkfield strong-motion array, Calif. Geol. 36, 27-30.
23. Murray, J. (2004). Preliminary Slip Model, www.cisn.org/special/evt. 04.09.28/finite.jmurray.html (last accessed July 2006).
24. Pitarka, A., P. Somerville, Y. Fukushima, T. Uetake, and K. Irikura (2000). Simulation of near-fault strong ground motion using hybrid Green's functions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 566-586.
25. Pulido, N., A. Ojeda, K. Atakan, and T. Kubo (2004). Strong ground motion estimation in the Sea of Marmara Region (Turkey) based on a scenario earthquake, Techtonophysics 391, 357-374.
26. Rymer, M. J., J. C. Tinsley, J. A. Treiman, J R. Arrowsmith, K. B. Clahan, A. M. Rosinski, W. A. Bryant, H. A. Snyder, G. S. Fuis, N. Toké, and G. W. Bawden (2006). Surface fault slip associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S11-S27.
27. Shakal, A., V. Glaizer, M. Huang, R. Borcherdt, H. Haddadi, K. Lin, C. Stephens, and P. Roffers (2005). Preliminary analysis of strongmotion recordings from the 28 September 2004 Parkfield, California earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 76, no. 1, 27-39.
28. Somerville, P., K. Irikura, R. Graves, S. Sawada, D. Wald, N. Abrahamson, Y. Iwasaki, T. Kagawa, N. Smith, and A. Kowada (1999). Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion, Seism. Res. Lett. 70, 59-80.
29. Thurber, C., H. Zhang, F. Waldhauser, L. Doherty, J. Hardebeck, and D. E. Phillips (2006). Three-dimensional compressional wavespeed model, earthquake relocation, and focal mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, region, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S38-S49.