Examining the effects of hypothetical modifications in permitting procedures and river conditions on whitewater boating behavior

Journal of Leisure Research

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 558-574

  Siderelis, Christos ^a   Moore, Roger L ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intended behavior; Outdoor recreation; Stated preferences; Travel cost model; Whitewater boating

Indexed keywords

BOATING; OUTDOOR RECREATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CHATTOOGA COUNTY; GEORGIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845773444     PISSN: 00222216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2006.11950092     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1997). Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 65-84.
2. Autoweek (1996). Breaking down driving costs by mile and by year. Autoweek (April 1), 9.
3. Bengston, D. N., & Fan, D. P. (2002). The recreational fee demonstration program on the national forests: An updated analysis of public attitudes and beliefs, 1996-2001. (Research Paper, NC-340). Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
4. Bowker, J. M., English, B. K., & Donovan, J. A. (1996). Toward a value for guided rafting on southern rivers. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28, 423-432.
5. Bockstael, N. E., & McConnell, K. E. (1991). Public goods as characteristics of non-market commodities. Economic Journal, 103, 1244-1257.
6. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count-data. NY: Cambridge University Press.
7. Champ, P. A., & Bishop, R. C. (1996). Evidence on the accuracy of expenditures reported in recreational surveys. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21, 150-159.
8. Chase, L. C., Lee, D. R., Schulze, W. D. Schulze, & Anderson, D. J. (1998). Ecotourism demand and differential pricing of national park acess in Costa Rica. Land Economics, 74, 466-482.
9. Englin, J., & Cameron, T. A. (1996). Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 7, 133-147.
10. Grijalva, T. C., Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., & Shaw, W. D. (2002). Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 401-414.
11. Hellerstein, D., Woo, D., McCollum, & Donnelly, D. (1993). ZIPFIP: A zip and fips database. Washington D.C.: USDA, Economic Research Service, Resources and Technology Division, 1301 New York Ave. NW, Room 438.
12. Hudson, D. (2003). Problem solving and hypothesis testing using economic experiments. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 35, 337-347.
13. Kakoyannis, C., & Stankey, G. H. (2002). Assessing and evaluation recreation uses of water resources: Implications for an integrated management framework. (General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-536). Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
14. Kennedy, P. (1996). A guide to econometrics. (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 341-355.
16. Kerkvliet, J., & Nowell, C. (1999). Heterogeneous visitors and the spatial limits of travel cost model. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 404-419.
17. Loomis, J. B. (1993). An investigation into the reliability of intended visitation behavior. Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 183-191.
18. Mendelsohn, R., Matzkin, R., Peterson, G., & Rosenthal, D. (1994). Using conditional utility models for measuring welfare (Research Note RM-527.) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1-4.
19. Moore, R. L., & Driver, B. (2005). Introduction to outdoor recreation: Providing and managing natural resource based opportunities. Appendix A, Recreation Experience Preference Scales (pp. 315-320). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
20. Moore, R. L., & Siderelis, C. (2003). Use and economic importance of the West Branch of the Farmington River. Final Report. Washington D.C.: American Rivers, Inc. and Park Planning and Special Studies and Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Programs of the National Park Service.
21. Parsons, G. R. & Wilson, A. J. (1997). Incidental and joint consumption in recreation demand. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 26, 107-115.
22. Siderelis, C., Moore, R., & Lee, J. (2000). Incorporating users' perceptions of site quality in a recreation travel cost model. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 406-414.
23. Smith, K. V. & Kaoru, Y. (1986). Modeling recreation demand within a random utility framework. Economics Letters, 22, 395-399.
24. Stata Corporation (2003). Stata statistical software. Release 8.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
25. USDA Forest Service (2002). Chattooga Wild and Scenic River. Columbia, SC: Sumter National Forest. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/fms/ rec/Chattooga.pdf
26. Whitehead, J. C., Haab, T. C., & Huang, J. (2000). Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resource and Energy Economics, 22, 339-354.
27. Woolridge, J. M. (2000). Introductory econometric: A modern approach. US: Thomson Learning, South-Western College Publishing.