The ob/gyn and legal liability: Condition critical, part 2

Contemporary Ob/Gyn

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 57-72

  Lockwood, Charles J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845768450     PISSN: 00903159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Profitability by Line by State, 1976-2001 (National Association of Insurance Commissioners Insurance Products and Services Division), pages 116-117.
2. Medical Liability Monitor, 2003.
3. Kessler D. Law & Contemporary Problems 1997; CBO 1/04, JEC 5/03, GAO 7/03.
4. United States General Accounting Office, Report to Congressional Requesters. Medical Malpractice Insurance: Multiple factors have contributed to increased premium rates, 2003.
5. Beider P, Hagen S. U.S. Congressional Budget Office. Limiting tort liability for medical malpractice. Almanac of Policy Issues. Washington, DC: January 8, 2004.
6. Austin v American Association of Neurological Surgeons. 253 F. 3rd 967 (7th Cir. 2001), aff'g 120 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (N.D. III. 2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1078 (2002).
7. Lockwood CJ. Six steps to state-based tort reform. Contemporary OB/GYN. 2004;49(5):11-15.
8. Tillinghast-Towers Perrin. U.S. Tort Cost: 203 Update. Trends and findings on the costs of the U.S. tort system, 2003.
9. Office of Fiscal Analysis, Connecticut General Assembly, "Potential Revenues, Operating Costs and Liabilities of a Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Fund, December 10, 2003.
10. Written Communication from Ms. Kenney Shipley, Executive Director, Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), Post Office Box 14567, Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4567 to Dr. Strunk, August 12, 2004.