Evaluation of methods for extraction of the volitional EMG in dynamic hybrid muscle activation

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 3, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Langzam, Eran ^a   Isakov, Eli ^b   Mizrahi, Joseph ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b LOEWENSTEIN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EXTRACTION; FEMALE; FILTRATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYBRID; IN VIVO CULTURE; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE;

EID: 33845760070     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-27     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Genadry WF, Kearney RE, Hunter IW: Dynamic relationship between EMG and torque at the human ankle: variation with contraction level and modulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 1988, 26:489-493.
2. Rakos M, Freudencshufb B, Girsch W, Hofer C, Kaus J, Meiners T, Paternostro T, Mayr W: Electromyogram-controlled functional electrical stimulation for treatment of paralyzed upper extremity. Artif Organs 1999, 23(5):466-469.
3. Mizrahi J, Verbitsky O, Isakov E: Fatigue-induced changes in decline running. Clin Biomech 2001, 16(3):207-212.
4. Thorsen R, Ferrarin M, Spadone R, Frigo C: Functional control of the hand in tetraplegics based on residual synergistic EMG activity. Artif Organs 1999, 23(5):470-473.
5. Thorsen R, Spandone R, Ferrarin M: A pilot study of myoelectrically controlled FES of upper extremity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2001, 9(2):161-168.
6. Thorsen R, Ferrarin M, Veltink P: Enhancement of isometric ankle dorsiflexion by automyoelectrically controlled functional electrical stimulation on subjects with upper motor neuron lesions. Neuromodulation 2002, 5(4):256-263.
7. Yeom H, Park Y, Yoon H: Gram-Schmidt M-Wave canceller for the EMG controlled FES. IEICE Trans Inf Sys 2005, E88-D(9):2213-2217.
8. Peasgood W, Whitlock T, Baman A, Fry ME, Jones RS, Davis-Smith A: EMG-controlled closed loop electrical stimulation using digital signal processor. Electron Lett 2000, 36(22):1832-1833.
9. Saxena S, Nikolic S, Popovic D: An EMG-controlled system for tetraplegics. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995, 32(1):17-24.
10. Langzam E, Nemirvsky Y, Isakov E, Mizrahi J: Muscle enhancement using closed-loop electrical stimulation: Volitional versus induced torque. J Electromyogr Kinesiol . 2006, May 9
11. Langzam E, Nemirvsky Y, Isakov E, Mizrahi J: Evaluation of volitional and induced torque shares in electrically augmented muscle gait-like contractions. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006 in press.
12. Frigo C, Ferrarin M, Frasson W, Paven E, Thorsen R: EMG signals detection and processing for on-line control of functional electrical stimulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000, 10:351-360.
13. Pierce SR, Laughton CA, Smith BT, Orlin MN, Johnston TE, McCarthy JJ: Direct affect of percutaneous electric stimulation during gait in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A report of 2 cases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 85:339-343.
14. Keller T, Ellis MD, Dewald JPA: Overcoming abnormal joint torque patterns in paretic upper extremities using triceps stimulation. Artif Organs 2005, 29(3):229-232.
15. Minzly J, Mizrahi J, Hakim N, Liberson A: Stimulus artifact suppressor for EMG recordings during FES by constant-current stimulator. Med Biol Eng Comput 1993, 31(1):72-75.
16. Sennels S, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersen TA, Hansen SD: Functional neuromuscular stimulation controlled by surface electromyographic signals produced by volitional activation of the same muscle: adaptive rempoval of the muscle response from the recorded EMG-signal. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1997, 5(2):192-206.
17. Knaflitz M, Merletti R: Suppression of simulation artifacts from myoelectric-evoked potential recording. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988, 35(9):758-763.
18. Yoshida K, Stein RB: Characterization of signals and noise rejection with bipolar longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999, 46:226-234.
19. Andreasen LA, Struijk JJ: Artifact reduction with alternative cuff configurations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003, 50(10):1160-1166.
20. Hines AE, Cargo PE, Chapman GJ, Billian C: Stimulus artifact removal in EMG from muscles adjacent to stimulated muscle. J Neurosci Methods 1996, 64:55-62.
21. O'Keeffe DT, Lyons GM, Donnelly AE, Byrne CA: Stimulus artifact removal using a software-based two-stage peak detection algorithm. J Neurosci Methods 2001, 109:137-145.
22. Liang H, Lin Z: Stimulus artifact cancellation in the serosal recordings of gastric myoelectric ctivity using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002, 49(7):681-688.
23. Ortolan RL, Mori RN, Pereira RR, Cabral CMN, Pereira JC, Cliquet A: Evaluation of adaptive/nonadaptive filtering and wavelet transform techniques for noise reduction in EMG mobile acquisition equipment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003, 11(1):60-69.
24. Glitsch U, Baumann W: The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity. J Biomech 1997, 30(11/12):1123-1131.
25. Minzly J, Mizrahi J, Isakov E, Susak Z, Verbeke M: Computer-controlled portable stimulator for paraplegic patients. J Biomed Eng 1993, 15(4):333-338.
26. Olney SJ, Winter DA: Predictions of knee and ankle moments of force in walking from EMG and kinematic data. J Biomech 1985, 18(1):9-20.
27. Lloyd BG, Besier TF: An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J Biomech 2003, 36(6):765-776.