Hydrologic modeling as a development tool for HGM functional assessment models

Wetlands

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 161-180

  Hill, A Jason ^a   Neary, Vincent S ^a   Morgan, Kenneth L ^b  

^a Tennessee Technological University   (United States)

^b TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Depressional wetlands; Functional assessment; HGM classification; Hydrologic modeling

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND CLASSIFICATION; WETLAND;

HIGHLAND RIM; NORTH AMERICA; TENNESSEE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845755270     PISSN: 02775212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[161:HMAADT]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abtew, W. 1996. Evapotranspiration measurements and modeling for three wetland systems in south Florida. Water Resources Bulletin 32:465-473.
2. Ainslie, W. B., R. D. Smith, B. A. Pruitt, T. H. Roberts, E. J. Sparks, L. West, G. L. Godshalk, and M. V. Miller. 1999. A Regional Guidebook for Assessing the Functions of Low Gradient, Riverine Wetlands in Western Kentucky. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-17.
3. Asner, G. P., J. M. O. Scurlock, and J. A. Hicke. 2003. Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies. Global Ecology & Biogeography 12:191-204.
4. Azous, A. L. and R. R. Horner. 2001. Wetlands and Urbanization: Implications for the Future. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
5. Bhaduri, B., M. Grove, C. Lowry, and J. Harbor. 1997. Assessing long-term hydrologic effects of land use change. Journal of the American Water Works Association 89:94-106.
6. Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4.
7. Brinson, M. M. and R. Rheinhardt. 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:69-76.
8. Brooks, R. T. 2004. Weather-related effects on woodland vernal pool hydrology and hydroperiod. Wetlands 24:104-114.
9. Brooks, R. T. and M. Hayashi. 2002. Depth-area-volume and hydroperiod relationships of ephemeral (vernal) forest pools in southern New England. Wetlands 22:247-255.
10. Carroll, R., J. Tracy, and G. Pohll. 2000. Numeric Assessment of the Hydrogeomorphic Wetland Function: Phase II. Desert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, NV, USA. Publication No. 41166.
11. Clairain, E. J. 2002. Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Functions: Guidelines for Developing Regional Guidebooks; Chapter 1, Introduction and Overview of the Hydrogeomorphic Approach. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA. ERDC/EL TR-02-3.
12. Cole, C. A., R. P. Brooks, and D. H. Wardrop. 1997. Wetland hydrology as a function of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclass. Wetlands 17:456-467.
13. Craft, C. B. and W. P. Casey. 2000. Sediment and nutrient accumulation in floodplain and depressional freshwater wetlands of Georgia, USA. Wetlands 20:323-332.
14. Drexler, J. Z., R. L. Snyder, D. Spano, and U. K. T. Paw. 2004. A review of models and micrometeorological methods used to estimate wetland evapotranspiration. Hydrological Processes 18: 2071-2101.
15. Euliss, N. H. and D. M. Mushet. 1996. Water-level fluctuation in wetlands as a function of landscape condition in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16:587-593.
16. Hayashi, M. and G. van der Kamp. 2000. Simple equations to represent the volume-area-depth relations of shallow wetlands in small topographic depressions. Journal of Hydrology 237:74-85.
17. Hill, A. J. 2003. Part I: Factors affecting estimates of average watershed slope, Part II: A hydrologic functional assessment model for depressional wetlands. M.S. Thesis. Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN, USA.
18. Lott, R. B. and R. J. Hunt. 2001. Estimating evapotranspiration in natural and constructed wetlands. Wetlands 21:614-628.
19. Luo, T., R. P. Neilson, H. Tian, C. J. Vorosmarty, H. Zhu, and S. Liu. 2002. A model for the seasonality and distribution of leaf area index of forests and its application to China. Journal of Vegetation Science 13:817-830.
20. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, third edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.
21. Moore, I. D. and C. L. Larson. 1980. Hydrologic Impact of Draining Small Depressional Watersheds. ASCE Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division 106:345-363.
22. Ogawa, H. and J. W. Male. 1986. Simulating the flood mitigation role of wetlands. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 112:114-128.
23. Pohll, G. and J. Tracy. 1999. Numerical assessment of hydrogeomorphic wetland functions. Desert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, NV, USA. Publication No. 41163.
24. Saxton, K. E. 2004. Documentation for the Soil Plant Atmosphere Water (SPAW) model. U. S. Department of Agriculture Argricultural Research Service. Web Address 〈http://www.bsyse.wsu.edu/saxton/spaw/〉.
25. Shaffer, P. W., M. E. Kentula, and S. E. Gwin. 1999. Characterization of wetland hydrology using hydrogeomorphic classification. Wetlands 19:490-504.
26. Smith, B. J., H. W. Browers, T. E. Dahl, D. E. Nomsen, and K. F. Higgins. 1989. Indirect wetland drainage in association with federal highway projects in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 9: 27-39.
27. Smith, R. D. 2001. Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Functions: Guidelines for Developing Regional Guidebooks - Chapter 3 Developing a Reference Wetland System. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA. ERDC/EL TR-01-29.
28. Smith, R. D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M. M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRPDE-9.
29. Smith, R. D. and J. S. Wakeley. 2001. Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Functions: Guidelines for Developing Regional Guidebooks - Chapter 4 Developing Assessment Models. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report ERDC/EL TR-01-30.
30. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Engineering Division. Washington, DC, USA. Technical Release No. 55.
31. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1992. Soil survey for Putnam County, Tennessee. Soil Conservation Service, TN, USA.
32. van der Kamp, G. and M. Hayashi. 1998. The groundwater recharge function of small wetlands in the semi-arid Northern Prairies. Great Plains Research 8:39-56.
33. van Dijk, A. I. J. M. and L. A. Bruijnzeel. 2001. Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part I. Model description. Journal of Hydrology 247:230-238.
34. Wakeley, J. S. and R. D. Smith. 2001. Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Functions: Guidelines for Developing Regional Guidebooks - Chapter 7 Verifying, Field Testing, and Validating Assessment Model. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report ERDC/EL TR-01-31.
35. Wolfe, W. J. 1996. Karst wetlands of The Barrens, geomorphic control of wetland hydrology and plant distribution on the Highland Rim of Tennessee. Ph. D. Dissertation. Clark University, Worchester, MA, USA.