Transitions between flux vacua

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 74, Issue 12, 2006, Pages

  De Alwis, S P ^a,b  

^a PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845752888     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.126010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J.D. Brown and C. Teitelboim, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B297, 787 (1988). 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90559-7
2. R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 06 (2000) 006. 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/006
3. J.L. Feng, J. March-Russell, S. Sethi, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B602, 307 (2001). 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00097-9
4. For a discussion of this in a mini-superspace (cosmological) context see Refs..
5. A discussion of IIB coupling to branes using the PST formalism, which can be used if the manifold is topologically trivial, is given in Ref.. A discussion of a non-Lorentz invariant formalism that is valid in topologically nontrivial manifolds is given in Ref..
6. S. Kachru, J. Pearson, and H.L. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 06 (2002) 021. 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/021
7. A.R. Frey, M. Lippert, and B. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 68, 046008 (2003). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.046008
8. E. Witten, J. Geom. Phys. 22, 103 (1997). JGPHE5 0393-0440 10.1016/S0393-0440(97)80160-X
9. J. Polchinski, String Theory. Vol. 2: Superstring Theory and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998), p. 531.
10. S.B. Giddings, S. Kachru, and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 66, 106006 (2002). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.106006
11. S.P. de Alwis, Phys. Rev. D 56, 7963 (1997). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.7963
12. This method for coupling higher dimensional branes to the bulk was discussed in the context of M-theory in Ref..
13. Note that this Bianchi identity would appear to be inconsistent in the presence of NS 5-branes since in that case dH30. But in this case Eq. 36 would need to be modified because of the formation of bound states of D3 branes with NS 5-branes.
14. T.W. Grimm and J. Louis, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B718, 153 (2005). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.04.007
15. G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 06 (2005) 047. 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/06/047
16. O. DeWolfe, A. Giryavets, S. Kachru, and W. Taylor, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 07 (2005) 066. 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/07/066
17. J. Polchinski and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B460, 525 (1996). 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00614-1
18. M.B. Green, C.M. Hull, and P.K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 382, 65 (1996). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00643-0
19. In Appendix 2 we discuss an elegant geometrical formulation due to Belov and Moore where considerable progress towards achieving a background independent formulation is made.
20. E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest, and A. Van Proeyen, Classical Quantum Gravity CQGRDG 0264-9381 18, 3359 (2001). 10.1088/0264-9381/ 18/17/303
21. D. Belov and G.W. Moore, hep-th/0611020.
22. G.W. Moore and N. Saulina, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B670, 27 (2003). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.07.028
23. D.-E. Diaconescu, G.W. Moore, and E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1031 (2003). 1095-0761
24. T. Mohaupt and F. Saueressig, J. Cosomol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2005) 006.
25. A. Lukas, E. Palti, and P.M. Saffin, Phys. Rev. D 71, 066001 (2005). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.066001
26. T. Mohaupt and F. Saueressig, Fortschr. Phys. FPYKA6 0015-8208 53, 522 (2005). 10.1002/prop.200510213
27. M. Cariglia and K. Lechner, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B700, 157 (2004). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.08.023
28. D. Belov and G.W. Moore, hep-th/0605038.
29. S.P. de Alwis, Phys. Lett. B 413, 49 (1997). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01097-6