Design and robustness analysis of fighter aircraft flight control laws

European Journal of Control

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 71-85

  Biannic, Jean Marc ^a   Roos, C ^a   Knauf, A ^a  

^a ONERA   (France)

Author keywords

Fighter aircraft control; IGC frame work; LFT; LMI optimization; Slowly varying parameters

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLERS; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES; SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT;

AIRCRAFT FLIGHT CONTROL; DESIGN ANALYSIS; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT CONTROL; FLIGHT CONTROL LAW; FRAME-WORK; IGC FRAME WORK; LFT; LMI OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS; SLOWLY VARYING PARAMETER;

AIRCRAFT CONTROL;

EID: 33845746129     PISSN: 09473580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3166/ejc.12.71-85     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Apkarian P, Adams R. Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems. 1997; 6: 21-32
2. Becker G, Packard A. Robust performance of linear parametrically varying systems using parametricallydependent linear feedback. Syst Control Lett 1994; 23: 205-215
3. Biannic J-M, Apkarian P, Garrard W. Parametervarying control of high performance aircraft. In: Proc AIAA GNC Conf 1997; 20(2): 225-231
4. Biannic J-M, Ferreres G. Efficient computation of a guaranteed robustness margin. In: 16th IFAC world congress, Pragues, July 2005
5. Biannic J-M, Roos C. A new set of tools for robustness and nonlinear analysis. Free Web publication Available at http://www.cert.fr/dcsd/idco/perso/Biannic/mypage.html,2005
6. Boyd S,El Ghaoui L,Feron E,Balakrishnan V. Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory,vol 15 of applied mathematics. SIAM,Philadelphia,PA,1994.
7. Chilali M, Gahinet P, Apkarian P. Robust pole placement in lmi regions. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1999; 44(12): 2257-2270
8. D'Andrea R, Khatri S. Kalman decomposition oflinear fractional transformation representations and minimality. In: American Control Conference, vol 6, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 1997,pp. 3357-3361
9. Ferreres G, Biannic J-M. Skew Toolbox. Free Webpublication Available at http://www.cert.fr/dcsd/idco/perso/Biannic/mypage.html,2003
10. Fromion V, Scorletti G. A theoretical framework for gain scheduling. Int J Robust Nonlin Control 2003; 13(10): 951-982
11. Gahinet P, Nemirovski A, Laub AJ, Chilali M. LMI control toolbox. The Mathworks, Inc. 1995
12. Helmersson A. Methods for robust gain scheduling. Linkoping Studies in Science and Technologiy. Dissertations, No.406, 1995
13. Jonsson U, Kao C-Y, Megretski A, Rantzer A. IQCβ: A Matlab Toolbox for robust stability and performanceanalysis, Release 030. Free Web publication Available at http://www.ee.mu.oz.au/staff/cykao/,2004
14. Jonsson U, Rantzer A. Systems with uncertain parameters- time-variations with bounded derivatives. Int J Robust Nonlin Control 1996; 6: 969-982
15. Kao C-Y, Megretski A, Jonsson U. Specialized fast algorithms for iqc feasibility and optimization problems. Automatica 2004; 40: 239-252
16. Knauf A. Implantation of LFT scheduled gains. Research project report. Available at http://www.cert.fr/dcsd/idco/perso/Knauf/index.html,2004,1001-1025
17. Leith DJ,Leithead WE. Survey of gain-scheduling analysis and design. Int J Control 2000; 73(11): 1001?1025.
18. Lind R, Balas GJ, Packard A. Robustness analysis with linear time-invariant and time-varying real uncertainty. In: Proceedings of AIAA Conference, Baltimore, USA. July, 1995, pp 132-140
19. Magni J-F. Linear fractional representation Toolbox for use with Matlab. Free web publication Available at http://www.cert.fr/dcsd/idco/perso/Magni/booksandtb.html#lfrt,2001
20. Megretski A, Rantzer A. System analysis via integral quadratic constraints. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1997; 42(6): 819-830
21. Parrilo P. Structured semidefinite programs andsemialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization. PhD thesis of California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, Available at http://www.mit.edu/parrilo/pubs/index.html,2000
22. Rantzer A. Uncertainties with bounded rate of variation. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, San Francisco, CA. June, 1993, pp 29-30
23. Rantzer A. On the Kalman Yakubovich Popov Lemma. Syst Control Lett 1996; 28(1): pp. 7-10
24. Rauw M. FDC 1.2, A Simulink Toolbox for flight dynamics and control analysis. Research project report and software, Delft University of Technology,2001
25. Rugh WJ, Shamma JS. Research on gain-scheduling. Automatica 2000; 36: 1401-1425
26. Scherer C, Chilali M, Gahinet P. Multiobjective output feedback control via lmi optimization. IEEE TransAutom Control 1997; 42(7): 896-911
27. Stilwell DJ, Rugh WJ. Interpolation methods for gain scheduling. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference onDecision and Control, Tampa, FL. USA. December, 1998, pp 3003-3008
28. Vandenberghe L, Balakrishnan VR, Wallin R, Hansson A. On the implementation of primal-dual interior-point methods for semidefinite programming problems derived from the KYP lemma. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, Hawaii, USA. December, 2003, pp 4658-4663