Prevention of tendon adhesions by the reconstruction of the tendon sheath with solvent dehydrated bovine pericard: An experimental study

Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1467-1472

  Sungur, Nezih ^a,c   Uysal, Afşin ^a   Koçer, Uǧur ^a   Karaaslan, Önder ^a   Gümüş, Murat ^a   Sökmensüer, Lale Karakoç ^b   Sökmensüer, Cenk ^b  

^a ANKARA TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Repair; Sheath; Solvent dehydrated bovine pericardium; Tendon

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TENDON SHEATH; TENDON SURGERY; TOE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADHESIONS; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL DRESSINGS; CHICKENS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FINGER INJURIES; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TENDON INJURIES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 33845739689     PISSN: 00225282     EISSN: 15298809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196344.61787.62     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hanff G, Hagberg L. Prevention of Restrictive Adhesions With Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Diffusible Membrane Following Flexor Tendon Repair: An Experimental Study in Rabbits. J Hand Surg. 1998; 23A:658-664.
2. Strickland JW. 25th Anniversary Presentation. Development of Flexor Tendon Surgery: Twenty-Five Years of Progress. J Hand Surg. 2000; 25A:214-235.
3. Potenza AD. Prevention of Adhesions to Healing Digital Flexor Tendons. JAMA. 1964;187:99-103.
4. Bunnell S. Repair of Tendons in the Fingers and Description of Two New Instruments. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1918;26:103-110.
5. Peterson WW, Manske PR, Dunlap J, Horwitz DS, Kahn B. Effect of Various Methods of Restoring Flexor Sheath Integrity on the Formation of Adhesions After Tendon Injury. J Hand Surg. 1990;15A:48-56.
6. An-Min L, Shi-Bi L. Reconstruction of Sheath With Fascial Graft in Flexor Tendon Repair: An Experimental Study. B J Hand Surg. 1991; 16B:179-184.
7. Strauch B, de Moura W, Ferder M, et al. The Fate of Tendon Healing After Restoration of the Integrity of the tendon sheath With Autogenous Vein Grafts. J Hand Surg. 1985; 10A:6:790-795.
8. Tutoplast Processed Pericardium package insert. Costa Mesa, CA: Innovative Opthalmic Products, Inc.
9. Weissgold DJ, Millay RH, Bochow TA. Rescue of Exposed Scleral Buckles With Cadaveric Pericardial Patch Grafts. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:4:753-758.
10. Eiken O, Hagberg L, Rank F. The Healing Process of Transplanted Digital Tendon Sheath Synovium. Experimental Autoradiographic Studies in Chickens. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;12:3:225-229.
11. Lister GD. Incision and Closure of the Flexor Sheath During Primary Tendon Repair. Hand. 1983;15:123-135.
12. Amadio PC, Hunter JM, Jaeger SH, Wehbe MA, Schneider LH. The Effect of Vincular Injury on the Results of Flexor Tendon Surgery in Zone 2. J Hand Surg. 1985;10:626-632.
13. Peterson WW, Manske PR, Kain CC, Lesker PA. Effect of Flexor Sheath Integrity on Tendon Gliding: A Biomechanical and Histologic Study. J Ortop Res. 1986;4:458-465.
14. Hooper G, Davies R, Tuthill P. Blood Flow and Clearance in Tendons. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984; 66B:441-443.
15. Hunter JM. Artificial Tendons. Early Development and Application. Am J Surg. 1965;109:3:325-338.
16. Lindsay WK, Thomson HG. Digital Flexor Tendons: An Experimental Study (Part 1). The Significance of Each Compartment of the Flexor Mechanism in Tendon Healing. Br J Plast Surg. 1959;12:289-316.
17. Kessler FB, Epstein MJ, Lannik D, Maher D, Pappu S. Fascia Patch Graft for A Digital Flexor Sheath Defect Over Primary Tendon Repair in the Chicken. J Hand Surg. 1986; 11A:241-245.
18. Stark HH, Boyes JH, et al. l. The Use of Paratenon, Polyethylene Film, or Silastic Sheeting to Prevent Restricting Adhesions to Tendons in the Hand. J Bone And Joint Surg. 1977;59A:7:908-913.
19. Holtz M, Midenberg ML, Kirschenbaum SE. Utilization of a silastic sheet in tendon repair of the foot. J Foot Surg. 1982;21:253-259.
20. Menderes A, Mola F, Tayfur V, Vayvada H, Barutcu A. Prevention of peritendinious adhesions following flexor tendon injury. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:560-564.
21. Karakurum G, Buyukbebeci O, Kalender M, Gulec A. Seprafilm interposition for preventing adhesion formation after tenolysis. An experimental study on the chicken flexor tendons. J Surg Res. 2003;113:195-200.
22. Meislin RJ, Wiseman DM, Alexander H, et al. A biomechanical study of tendon adhesion reduction using a biodegradable barrier in a rabbit model. J Appl Biomater. 1990;1:13-19.
23. Lindsay WK, Walker FG. The Effect of an Antihistamine (promethazine) on digital flexor tendon healing in the chicken. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1961;28:634-648.
24. Ketchum LD. The effects of triamcinolone on tendon healing and function: a laboratory study. Plast Reconst Surg. 1971;47:471-482.
25. Szabo RM, Younger E. Effect of Indomethacinon Adhesion Formation After Repair of Zone 2 Tendon Lacerations in the Rabbits. J Hand Surg. 1990;15A:480-483.
26. Peacock EE, Madden JW. Some studies of the effects of beta-aminopropionitrile in patients with injured flexor tendons. Surgery. 1969: 66; 215-223.
27. Hagberg L, Gerdin B. Sodium hyaluronate as an adjunct in adhesion prevention after flexor tendon surgery in rabbits. J Hand Surg. 1992:17:935-941.
28. Porat S, Rousso M, Shoshan S. Improvement of gliding function of flexor tendons by topically applied enriched collagen solution. J Bone Joint Surg. 1980;62:208-213.
29. Frykman E, Jacobson, Widenfalk B. Fibrin sealant in prevention of flexor adhesions. An experimental study in the rabbit. J Hand Surg. 1993;18:68-75.
30. Palese MA, Burnett AL. Corporoplasty Using Pericardium Allograft (Tutoplast) With Complex Penile Prosthesis Surgery. Urology. 2001;58:1049-1052.
31. Ghoniem GM. Allograft Sling Material: Is It State of the Art? Int Urogynecol. 2000;11:69-70.
32. Leungwattakij S, Bivalacqua TJ, Reddy S, et al. Long-term follow-up on use of pericardial graft in the surgical management of Peyronie's disease. Int J Impotence Res. 2001;13:183-185.
33. Leungwattanakýj S, Bivalacqua TJ, Caulfield JJ, Hellstrom WJ. Evaluation of Cadaveric Pericardium in the Rat for the Surgical Treatment of Peyronie's Disease. Urology. 2000;56:1075-1080.
34. Filippi R, Schwarz M, Voth D, et al. Bovine pericardium for duraplasty: clinical results in 32 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2000;24:103-107.
35. Anson JA, Marchand EP. Bovine pericardium for dural grafts: clinical results in 35 patients. Neurosurgery. 1996;39:764-768.
36. Fallon B. Cadaveric Dura Mater Graft for Correction of Penile Curvature in Peyronie's Disease. Urology. 1990;35:127-129.
37. Raviv T, Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, et al. l. Pericardial Patch Grafts in Glaucoma Implant Surgery. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:27-32.
38. Smiddy WE, Miller D, Flyyn HW Jr. Scleral buckle removal following episcleral silicon implants and cryopexy in retinal detachment surgery: clinical and microbiologic aspects. Opthalmic Surg. 1993;24:440-445.
39. Schein OD. The Use of Processed Pericardial Tissue in Anterior Ocular Segment Reconstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:549-542.