A bi-level decision-making model for min-max transfer capabilities assessment with consideration to voltage stability

Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems

Volumn 30, Issue 22, 2006, Pages

  Huang, Wei ^a   Huang, Minxiang ^a   Gan, Deqiang ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Available transfer capability (ATC); Bi level optimization; Min max transfer capability; Uncertainty; Voltage stability

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEM STABILITY;

AVAILABLE TRANSFER CAPABILITY (ATC); BI LEVEL OPTIMIZATION; MIN MAX TRANSFER CAPABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; VOLTAGE STABILITY;

ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS;

EID: 33845736121     PISSN: 10001026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. North American Electric Reliability Council. Available transfer capability definitions and determination[EB/OL]. [2006-01-05]. http://www.nerc.com/-filez/atcwg.html.
2. HUANG Wei, HUANG Minxiang, ZHAO Xueshun, et al. Transmission reliability margin assessment based on leader-follower decision-making model. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2006, 30(4): 17-28.
3. CRISAN O, LIU M. Voltage collapse prediction using an improved sensitivity approach. Electric Power System Research, 1994, 28(3): 181-190.
4. BEGOVIC M M, PHADKE A G. Dynamic simulation of voltage collapse. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1990, 5(4): 1529-1534.
5. ZHAO Jinquan, ZHANG Boming, Summarization of continuation power flow and its applications in static stability analysis of power system. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2005, 29(11): 91-97.
6. CAN D, LUO X, BOURCIER D V, et al. Min-max transfer capability of a transmission interface. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2003, 25(5): 347-353.
7. LIU Mingbo, YANG Yong. Optimal reactive power planning incorporating steady state voltage stability constraints. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2005, 29(5): 21-25.
8. BARD J F. Practical bilevel optimization: algorithms and applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
9. AUDET C, HANSEN P, JAUMARD B, et al. Links between linear bilevel and mixed 0-1 programming problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 1997, 93(2): 273-300.
10. YE J J. Necessary conditions for bilevel dynamic optimization//Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Decision and Control: Vol 1, Dec 14-16, 1994, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 1994: 507-512.
11. SHI Chenggen, LU Jie, ZHANG Guangquan. An extended Kuhn-Tucker approach for linear bilevel programming. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2005, 164(3): 51-63.
12. SHI Chenggen, LU Jie, ZHANG Guangquan. An extended kth-best approach for linear bilevel programming. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2005, 164(3): 843-855.
13. SAVARD G, ZOWE J. The steepest descent direction for the nonlinear bilevel programming problem. Operations Research Letters, 1994, 15(5): 121-152.
14. CAMPELO Manoel, SCHEIMBERG Susana. A note on a modified simplex approach for solving bilevel linear programming problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 126(2): 454-458.
15. EDMUNDS T A, BARD J F. Algorithms for nonlinear bilevel mathematical programs. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1991, 21(1): 83-89.
16. GENG Guangfei, YANG Rengang. Reactive power optimization of regional power network by directed mutation based genetic algorithm. Power System Technology, 2004, 28 (10): 42-44.