In vitro measurement of pressure differences using manometry at various injection speeds during discography

Spine Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 68-73

  Seo, Kwan Sik ^a   Derby, Richard ^b   Date, Elaine S ^c   Lee, Sang Heon ^a   Kim, Byung Jo ^a   Lee, Chang Hyung ^b  

^a Korea University Ansan Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Spinal Diagnostics and Treatment Center   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Discography; Intradiscal pressure; Low back pain

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISKOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FLUOROSCOPY; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MANOMETRY; NEEDLE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; SWINE; TRANSDUCER;

ANIMALS; ARTHROGRAPHY; INJECTIONS, SPINAL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LOW BACK PAIN; MANOMETRY; MODELS, ANIMAL; ORTHOPEDICS; PRESSURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; TRANSDUCERS, PRESSURE;

EID: 33845733295     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Guyer R.D., and Ohnmeiss D.D. Lumbar discography. Position statement from the North American Spine Society Diagnostic and Therapeutic Committee. [see comments]. Spine 20 (1995) 2048-2059
2. Carragee EJ. Diagnostic testing: Discograms. Paper presented at: NASS 19th Annual Scientific Meeting; 2004; Chicago, IL.
3. Carragee EJ, et al. Provocative discography in volunteer subjects with mild persistent low back pain. Paper presented at: 29th Annual meeting of International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine; 2002; Cleveland, OH.
4. Carragee E.J., et al. Prospective controlled study of the development of lower back pain in previously asymptomatic subjects undergoing experimental discography. Spine 29 (2004) 1112-1117
5. Carragee E.J., et al. The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. Spine 25 (2000) 1373-1380 discussion 1381
6. Carragee E.J., et al. False-positive findings on lumbar discography: reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection. Spine 24 (1999) 2542-2547
7. Bogduk N., and Modic M.T. Lumbar discography. Spine 21 (1996) 402-404
8. Connor P.M., and Darden B. Cervical discography complications and clinical efficacy. Spine 18 (1993) 2035-2038
9. Greenspan A., et al. Is there a role for diskography in the era of magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective correlation and quantitative analysis of computed tomography-diskography, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical findings. J Spinal Disord 5 (1992) 26-31
10. O'Neill C., and Kurgansky M. Subgroups of positive discs on discography. Spine 29 (2004) 2134-2139
11. Caragee E. Criteria for MRI grading scheme used in Carragee E.J., C.M. Tanner, et al. (2000). The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms?. Spine 25 (2000) 1373-1380
12. Carragee E.J., et al. Provocative discography in patients after limited lumbar discectomy: a controlled, randomized study of pain response in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Spine 25 (2000) 3065-3071
13. Carragee E.J., et al. Can discography cause long-term back symptoms in previously asymptomatic subjects?. Spine 25 (2000) 1803-1808
14. Carragee E.J., et al. Provocative discography in patients after limited lumbar discectomy: a controlled, randomized study of pain response in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Spine 25 (2000) 3065-3071
15. Quinnell R.C., and Stockdale H.R. Flexion and extension radiography of the lumbar spine: a comparison with lumbar discography. Clin Radiol 34 (1983) 405-411
16. Simmons J.W., et al. Awake discography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 16 6 Suppl (1991) S216-S221
17. Siwek S.M., and Waldman S.D. Discography in clinical practice. In: Waldman S.D. (Ed). Interventional pain management. 2nd ed. (2001), Saunders, Philadelphia 135-141
18. Grubb S.A., and Kelly C.K. Cervical discography: clinical implications from 12 years of experience. Spine 25 (2000) 1382-1389
19. Donelson R., et al. A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain. A predictor of symptomatic discs and anular competence. Spine 22 (1997) 1115-1122
20. Buirski G., and Watt I. Dynamic CT discography: an evaluation of a new technique. Australas Radiol 32 (1988) 197-202
21. Derby R., et al. The ability of pressure-controlled discography to predict surgical and nonsurgical outcomes. Spine 24 (1999) 364-371 discussion 371-2
22. Lee S.H., et al. In vitro measurement of pressure in intervertebral discs and annulus fibrosus with and without annular tears during discography. Spine J 4 (2004) 614-618
23. Derby R. Diagnostic block procedures: use in pain localization. Spine: State of the Art Reviews 1 (1986) 47-65
24. Derby R. Lumbar discometry. International Spinal Injection Society Newsletter 1 (1993)
25. Derby R., Bogduk N., and Schwarzer A. Precision percutaneous blocking procedures for localizing spinal pain. Part 2: The posterior lumbar compartment. Pain Digest 3 (1993) 175-188
26. Bosacco S.J. Lumbar discography: redefining its role with intradiscal therapy. Orthopedics 9 (1986) 399-401
27. Schwarzer A.C., et al. The ability of computed tomography to identify a painful zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 20 (1995) 907-912