Estimating mortality from mean length data in nonequilibrium situations, with application to the assessment of goosefish

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 476-487

  Gedamke, Todd ^a   Hoenig, John M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHOD; FISH; GROWTH RATE; MORTALITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANIMALIA; LOPHIUS AMERICANUS;

EID: 33845716091     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T05-153.1     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Baranov, F. I. 1918. On the question of the biological basis of fisheries. Nauchnyi Issledovatelskii Iktiologisheskii Institut Izvestiaa 1:81-128.
2. Beverton, R. J. H., and S. J. Holt. 1956. A review of methods for estimating mortality rates in fish populations, with special reference to sources of bias in catch sampling. Rapports et Procès-verbaux des Réunions, Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 140:67-83.
3. Beverton, R. J. H., and S. J. Holt. 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Investigations Series II, Marine Fisheries, Great Britain Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 19.
4. Hilborn, R., and C. J. Walters. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics, and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, New York.
5. NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center). 2002. Report of the 34th Northeast Regional Stock Assessment Workshop (34th SAW): Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC) consensus summary of assessments. National Marine Fisheries Service, Reference Document 02-06, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
6. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 191.
7. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.