Exploring the relationship between mediating tools and student perception of interdependence in a CSCL environment

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 385-400

  Lin, Yi Mei ^a   Laffey, James ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845708820     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bannon, L., & Bødker, S. (1991). Beyond the interface: Encountering artifacts in use. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface. NY: Cambridge UP.
2. Bell, P., & Winn, W. (2000). Distributed cognitions, by nature and by design. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 123-145). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (1999). Educational applications of CMCs: Solving case studies through asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(3). Retrieved July 23, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue3/benbunan-fich.html
4. Berge, Z., & Collins, M. (1995). Computer mediated communication and the online classroom: Overview and perspectives. In Z. Berge, & M. Collins (Eds.), Computer mediated communication Vol. 1 (pp. 129-137). NJ: Hamptom Press.
5. Bhattacharya, M., & Chatterjee, R. (2000). Collaborative Innovation as a Process for Cognitive Development. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 11(3), 295-312.
6. nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
7. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
8. nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). Retrieved July 24, 2003, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/jte-v7n1/gokhale.jte-v7n1.html
10. Harasim, L. (Ed.). (1990). Online education: perspectives on a new environment. NY: Praeger.
11. Hiltz, S. R. (1990). Evaluating the virtual classroom. In L. Harasim (Ed.). Online education: perspectives on a new environment (pp. 133-169). NY: Praeger.
12. Hiltz, S. R., Dufner, D., Fjermestad, J., Kim, Y., Ocker, R., Rana, A., & Turoff, M., (1996). Distributed group support systems: Theory development and experimentation. In B.M. Olsen, J.B., Smith & T. Malone (Eds.), Coordination theory and collaboration technology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
14. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: the theoretical anatomy of group learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
15. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
16. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1995). Cooperative learning and individual student achievement in secondary schools. In J. E. Pederson and A. D. Digby (Eds.), Secondary schools and cooperative learning. New York: Garland Publishing.
17. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 89-121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 35-51.
19. Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Leont'ev (Leontyev), A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
22. Lin, Y., Lin, G., & Laffey, J. (2004). Investigating the process of group interaction and students cognitive skills in online small group activities. Paper presented at AERA annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
23. Oliver, R. & Omari, A. (1998). Exploring student interactions in collaborative World Wide Web computer-based learning environments. Journal of Educational multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 263-287.
24. Rowlands, S. (2000). Turning Vygotsky on his head: Vygotsky's scientifically-based method and the socioculturalist's social order. Science and Education, 9, 537-575.
25. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Using student team learning. Baltimore, MD: The Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
26. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computer & Education, 42, 403-424.
27. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195-229.
28. Thomson, H. & Meggit, C. (1997). Human growth and development. Abingdon: Bookpoint
29. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(1), 8-22.
30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Wolz, U., Walker, H., Palme, J., Anderson, P., Chen, Z., Dunne J., Karlsson, G., Laribi, A., Mannikko, S., & Spielvogel, R. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in collaborative educational settings: Report of the ITiCSE' 97 working group on CMC in collaborative educational settings. ACM SIGCUE Outlook, 25(4), 51-68.