Application of machine perfusion preservation as a viability test for marginal kidney graft

Transplantation

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1425-1428

  Matsuno, Naoto ^a   Konno, Osamu ^a   Mejit, Abudushukur ^a   Jyojima, Yoshimaro ^a   Akashi, Isao ^a   Nakamura, Yuki ^a   Iwamoto, Hitoshi ^a   Hama, Koichiro ^a   Iwahori, Toru ^a   Ashizawa, Tatsuhito ^a   Nagao, Takeshi ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Graft viability; Kidney transplantation; Machine perfusion preservation; Nonheartbeating donor

Indexed keywords

AZATHIOPRINE; CYCLOSPORIN; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT; MIZORIBINE; PREDNISOLONE; TACROLIMUS; THYMOCYTE ANTIBODY;

ACUTE KIDNEY TUBULE NECROSIS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CADAVER; GRAFT PRESERVATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LEUKOPENIA; PERFUSION PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CADAVER; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PERFUSION; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE DONORS; TISSUE SURVIVAL;

EID: 33845704999     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000243733.77706.99     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Lim EC, Terasaki PL. Clinical Transplants 1991: Early graft function. Terasaki PL, ed. Los Angeles: UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory; 1992: 401.
2. Sellers MT, Gallidhio MH, Hadson SL, et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile presevation. Clin Transpl 2000; 14: 543.
3. Matsuno N, Sakurai E, Uchiyama M, et al. Role of machine perfusion preservation in kidney transplantation from non-heart-beating-donors. Clin Transpl 1998; 12: 1.
4. Belzer FO, Southard JH. The future of kidney preservation. Transplantation 1980; 30: 161.
5. Koyama H, Cecka JM, Terasaki PL. A comparison of cadaver donor kidney storage methods; Pump perfusion and cold storage solutions. Clin Transpl 1993; 7: 199.
6. Wight JP, Chilcott JB, Holmes MW, et al. Pulsatile machine perfusion vs cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic view. Clin Transpl 2003; 17: 293.
7. Matsuno N, Kozaki M, Sakurai E, et al. Effect of combination in situ cooling and nachine perfusion preservation on non-heart beating donor kidney procurment. Transpl Proc 1993; 25: 1516.
8. Nemoto T, Matsuno N, Degawa Y, et al. Successful renal transplantation from non-heart-beating donors with a high creatinine. Transpl Proc 1998; 30: 3785.
9. Matsuno N, Sakurai E, Tamaki I, et al. Effectiveness of machine oerfusion preservation as a viability determination method for kidneys procured from non-heart beating donors. Transpl Proc 1994; 26(4): 2421.
10. Tesi RJ, Elkhammas EA, Davis EA, et al. Pulsatile kidney perfusion for evaluation of high-risk kidney donors safely expands the donor pool. Clin Transpl 1994; 8: 134.
11. Willem HC, Oomen APA, Jenssen MA, et al. Glutathione S-transferase as predictor of functional outcome in transplantation of machine preserved non-heart-beating donor kidneys. Transplantation 2002; 63: 89.
12. Light G, Grage F, Kowaiski AE, et al. Immediate function and cost comparison between static and pulsatile preservation kidney recipients. Clin Transpl 1996; 10: 233.