Land cover change within the Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve: 1974-2001

Journal of Coastal Research

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1552-1557

  Hilbert, Kent W ^a  

^a STENNIS SPACE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Geospatial; Gulf of Mexico; Landsat; Mississippi; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; ESTUARY; HABITAT RESTORATION; LAND COVER; MARINE PARK; MARINE POLICY; SALTMARSH; SAVANNA; WETLAND;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; GULF OF MEXICO;

ANIMALIA; PINUS SEROTINA;

EID: 33845687841     PISSN: 07490208     EISSN: 15515036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2112/05-0582.1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. COHEN, W.B. and GOWARD, S.N., 2004. Landsat's role in ecological applications of remote sensing. BioScience, 54(6), 535-545.
2. CRACKNELL, A.P., 1999. Remote sensing techniques in estuaries and coastal zones - an update. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(4), 485-496.
3. DARNELL, R.M., 1992. Ecological history, catastrophism, and human impact on the Mississippi/Alabama continental shelf and associated waters: a review. Gulf Research Reports, 8(4), 375-386.
4. HANSEN, M.C. and DEFRIES, R.S., 2004. Detecting long-term global forest change using continuous fields of tree-cover maps from 8-km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data for the years 1982-99. Ecosystems, 7(7), 695-716.
5. INMAN, D.L., 1994. Types of coastal zones: similarities and differences. In: Environmental Science in the Coastal Zone: Issues for Further Research, National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. JENSEN, J.R., 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
7. LU, D.; MAUSEL, P.; BATISTELLA, M., and MORAN, E., 2005. Landcover binary change detection methods for use in the moist tropical region of the Amazon: a comparative study. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(1), 101-114.
8. MALTHUS, T.J. and MUMBY, P.J., 2003. Remote sensing of the coastal zone: an overview and priorities for future research. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(13), 2805-2815.
9. MORTON, R.; MILLER, T., and MOORE, L., 2004. National assessment of shoreline change: Part 1: Historical shoreline changes and associated coastal land loss along the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 2004-1043, 45p.
10. SCHMID, K., 2000. Shoreline erosion analysis of Grand Bay marsh. http://geology.deq.state.ms.us/coastal/NOAA_DATA/Publications/Publications/ Jackson/Shoreline%20Erosion%20Analysis%20of%20Grand%20Bay%20Marsh.pdf (accessed March 27, 2006).
11. SCHMID, T.; KOCH, M.; GUMUZZIO, J., and MATHER, P.M., 2004. A spectral library for semi-arid wetland and its application to studies of wetland degradation using hyperspectral and multispectral data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(13), 2485-2496.
12. SCHUYLER, Q.; STEVENSON, B.; RECKSIEK, H.; CRAWFORD, M., and TREML, M., 2002. Addressing habitat issues with remote sensing in the National Estuarine Research Reserve System: needs assessment final report, October 2002. NOAA's Estuarine Reserves Division and Coastal Services Center, 56p.
13. SHALABY, A.; GHAR, M.A., and TATEISHI, R., 2004. Desertification impact assessment in Egypt using low resolution satellite data and GIS. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 61(4), 375-383.
14. TUCKER, C.J., 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8, 127-150.