Large margin DragPushing strategy for centroid text categorization

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 215-220

  Tan, Songbo ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Machine learning; Text classification

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ERROR ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

CENTROID CLASSIFIERS; GENERALIZATION CAPABILITY; TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 33845681982     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Apte, C., Damerau, F., & Weiss, S. (1998). Text mining with decision rules and decision trees. Proceedings of the workshop with conference on automated learning and discovery: Learning from text and the Web.
2. Crammer, K., Gilad-Bachrach, R., Navot, A., & Tishby, N. (2002). Margin analysis of the lvq algorithm. In NIPS.
3. Han, E., & Karypis, G. (2000). Centroid-based document classification analysis & experimental result. In PKDD.
4. Joachims, T. (1997). A probabilistic analysis of the Rocchio algorithm with TFIDF for text categorization. In ICML (pp. 143-151).
5. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In ECML (pp. 137-142).
6. Lewis, D. D. (1998). Naive (Bayes) at forty: the independence assumption in information retrieval. In ECML (pp. 4-15).
7. Lewis, D. D., Schapire, R. E., Callan, J. P., & Papka, R. (1996). Training algorithms for linear text classifiers. In SIGIR (pp. 298-306).
8. Liu, Y., Yang, Y., & Carbonell, J. (2002). Boosting to correct inductive bias in text classification. In CIKM (pp. 348-355).
9. Schapire R.E., and Singer Y. Boostexter: A boosting-based system for text categorization. Machine Learning 39 (2000) 135-168
10. Tan, S., Cheng, X., Ghanem, M. M., Wang, B., & Xu, H. (2005). A novel refinement approach for text categorization. In CIKM (pp. 469-476).
11. van Rijsbergen C. Information retrieval (1979), Butterworths, London
12. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory (1995), Springer, New York
13. Wu, H., Phang, T. H., Liu, B., & Li, X. (2002). A refinement approach to handling model misfit in text categorization. In SIGKDD (pp. 207-216).
14. Yang, Y., & Lin, X. (1999). A re-examination of text categorization methods. In SIGIR (pp. 42-49).
15. Yang, Y., & Pedersen, J. O. (1997). A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In ICML (pp. 412-420).
16. Zhang T. Regularized winnow methods. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13 (2001) 703-709