Making environmental self-regulation mandatory

Global Environmental Politics

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1-12

  Arnold, Richard ^a   Whitford, Andrew B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; POLITICAL CHANGE; REGULATORY APPROACH;

HARNESS;

EID: 33845678507     PISSN: 15263800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/glep.2006.6.4.1     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Adebobola, Nathaniel-Imeh. 2004. Climbing the Wall of Unity from Environmental Perspectives: A United System Inevitable for Africa. Ajeam-Ragee 9: 37-42.
2. Ammenberg, Jonas, and Olof Hjelm. 2003. Tracing Business and Environmental Effects of Environmental Management Systems - A Study of Networking Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Using a Joint Environmental Management System. Business Strategy and the Environment 12 (3): 163-174.
3. Arrowsmith, S. 1998. National and International Perspectives on the Regulation of Public Procurement: Harmony or Conflict? In Public Procurement: Global Revolution, edited by S. Arrowsmith and A. Davies. London, UK: Kluwer Law International.
4. Barnett, Richard J., and Ronald E. Muller. 1974. Global Reach and the Power of the Multinational Corporations. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
5. Berry, Michael, and Dennis A. Rondinelli. 2000. Environmental Management in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Integrating Corporate Responsibility and Business Strategy. Environmental Quality Management 9 (3): 21-33.
6. Business for Social Responsibility. 2005. Supplier Environmental Management. Available at http://www.bsr.org/BSRResources/IssueBriefDetail.cfm? DocumentID=49622, accessed 31 July 2005.
7. Coglianese, Cary. 1999. Policy Implications of Environmental Management Systems. Washington, D.C: Papers Prepared for the Research Summit on Environmental Management Systems.
8. Commission of the European Communities. 2004. Commission Staff Working Document: Buying Green! A Handbook on Environmental Public Procurement. SEC (2004) 1050.
9. Crowe, Michael. 2000. Beyond Experiments. The Environmental Forum 17 (3): 20-29.
10. Dasgupta, Susmita, Hemamala Hettige, and David Wheeler. 2000. What Improves Environmental Compliance? Evidence from Mexican Industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39 (1): 39-66.
11. Delmas, M., and J. Mazurek. 2004. A Transaction Cost Perspective on Negotiated Agreements: The Case of the US EPA XL Program. In Voluntary Approaches to Climate Protection, edited by Andrea Baranzini and Philippe Thalmann. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.
12. Delmas, Magali, and Ann Terlaak. 2002. Regulatory Commitment to Negotiated Agreements: Evidence from the United States, Germany, The Netherlands, and France. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 4 (1): 5-29.
13. Delmas, Magali, and B. Heiman. 2001. Government Credible Commitment in the French and American Nuclear Industry. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (3):434-456.
14. Dinesh, Manimoli. 2005. Environment: Moving Beyond Kyoto. Energy Compass August 11, p. 1.
15. Eicher, Lawrence D. 2001. ISO 9000 and the Public Sector. Address of the ISO Secretary-General. 23 January 2001. Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
16. European Commission. 2006a. The Amsterdam Treaty: A Comprehensive Guide. Available at http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/al5000.htm.
17. European Commission. 2006b. EMAS - The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/index_en.htm.
18. European Partners for the Environment 2003. Compatibility of Different Environmental Management System Standards. Available at http://www.epe.be/ workbooks/emas/1.2.5.html.
19. Florida, R., and D. Davison. 2001. Gaining from Green Management: Environmental Management Systems Inside and Outside the Factory. California Management Review 43 (3): 64-65.
20. Friends of the Earth. 2003. ISO. Available at http://www.foei.org/trade/ activistguide/iso.htm.
21. General Accounting Office. 2000. Managing for Results - EPA Faces Challenges in Developing Results-Oriented Performance Goals and Measures. GAO/RCED-00-77.Washington, D.C.
22. _. 2001. Federal Procurement: Better Guidance and Monitoring Needed to Assess Purchases of Environmentally Friendly Products. GAO-01-430. Washington, D.C.
23. Gupta, M.C. 1995. Environmental Management and its Impact on the Operations Function. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15 (8): 34-51.
24. International Law Association. 2002. ILA New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law Relating to Sustainable Development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics 2 (2): 211-216.
25. Ite, Uwem E. 2004. Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Nigeria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11 (1): 1-11.
26. Jorg, Androif, and Malcolm McIntosh. 2001. Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
27. Khanna, Madhu, and Lisa Damon. 1999. EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37 (1): 1-25.
28. st Century and New Development Patterns. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. McCrudden, Christopher. 2004. Using Public Procurement to Achieve Social Outcomes. Natural Resources Forum 28 (4): 257-267.
30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002. OECD Act: Recommendation of the Council on Improving the Environmental Performance of Public Procurement. France: OECD Publications. Available at http://webdomino1.oecd.org/horizontal/oecdacts.nsf/linkto/c(2002)3.
31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003. The Environmental Performance of Public Procurement: Issues of Policy Coherence. France: OECD Publications.
32. Parker, Christine. 2002. The Open Corporation: Effective Self-regulation and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Potoski, Matthew, and Aseem Prakash. 2005. Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms' Regulatory Compliance. American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 235-248.
34. RELIEF. 2002. Eco-Procurement: The Path to a Greener Marketplace. The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, European Eco-Procurement Programme and Eco-Efficient Economy (ICLEI EPP). Freiburg, Germany.
35. Richards, Kenneth R. 2000. Framing Environmental Policy Instrument Choice. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 10 (2):221-286.
36. Rondinelli, Dennis A., and Gyula Vastag. 2000. Panacea, Common Sense, or Just a Label? The Value of ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems. European Management Journal 18 (5): 499-510.
37. Shell Oil Corporation. 2005. Welcome to Shell Nigeria. Available at http://www.shell.com/home/Framework?siteId=nigeria.
38. Siemens, Renetta. 2003. A Review and Critical Evaluation of Selected Greener Public Purchasing Programmes and Policies. In The Environmental Performance of Public Procurement: Issues of Policy Coherence. Paris: OECD Publications.
39. Spulber, Daniel F., and David Besanko. 1992. Delegation, Commitment, and the Regulatory Mandate. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 8 (1): 126-154.
40. Thai, Khi V. 2001. Public Procurement Re-Examined. Journal of Public Procurement 1 (1): 9-50.
41. Thatcher, Mark. 2002. Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation. West European Politics 25 (1): 125-147.
42. Warner, Katherine E., and Colin Ryall. 2001. Greener Purchasing Activities Within UK Local Authorities. Eco-Management and Auditing 8 (1): 36-45.