The challenge of decoupling agricultural support

EuroChoices

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 13-19

  Antón, Jesús ^a   Sckokai, Paolo ^b  

^a Alimentación y Medio Ambiente   (Spain)

^b Istituto di Economia Agro Alimentare   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL POLICY; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; EUROPEAN UNION; OECD;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 33845677624     PISSN: 14780917     EISSN: 1746692X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2006.00038.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Antón, J. and Lemouel, C. (2004). Do counter-cyclical payments in the FSRI Act create incentives to produce ? Agricultural Economics, 31/ 2-3: 277-284.
2. Arfini, F., (ed.) (2005a). Modelling Agricultural Policies: State of the Art and New Challenges. Proceedings of the 89th European Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists.
3. Benjamin, C. and Houée, M. (2005b). The impact on yields of moving from price support to area payments - a study of the 1992 CAP reform. OECD Papers No 423. Paris: OECD.
4. Coyle, B. (2005c). Dynamic econometric models of crop investment in Manitoba under risk aversion and uncertainty. OECD Papers No. AGR/CA/ APM(2005)1. Paris: OECD.
5. Dewbre, J., Anton, J. and Thompson, W. (2001). The transfer efficiency and trade effects of direct payments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83 (5): 1204-1214.
6. Goodwin, B.K. and Mishra, A.K. (2006). Are 'decoupled'farm program payments really decoupled?An empirical evaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88 (1): 73-89.
7. Hennessy, T. and Thorne, F.S. (2005). How decoupled are decoupled payments?The evidence from Ireland. EuroChoices, 4 (3): 30-35.
8. OECD (2005). Special issue on decoupling agricultural support. OECD Papers 5(11), papers 416 to 426 Paris: OECD. http://www.sourceOECD.org.
9. OECD (2005). Decoupling: Illustrating some open questions on the production impact of different policy instruments. OECD Papers 416. Paris: OECD.
10. OECD (2005). Risk effects of PSE crop measures. OECD Papers No 417. Paris: OECD.
11. OECD (2006). Decoupling: Policy Implications. Paris: OECD.
12. Sckokai, P. (2003). Risk Related Non-price effects of the CAP Arable Crop Regime: Results from an FADN Sample. Paris, OECD.
13. Sckokai, P. (2005). Modeling the impact of agricultural policies on farm investments under uncertainty: The case of the CAP arable crop regime. OECD Papers No. 425. Paris: OECD.
14. Sckokai, P. and Anton, J. (2005). The degree of decoupling of area payments for arable crops in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87 (5): 1220-1228.
15. Swinbank, A. and Tranter, R., (eds.) (2004). A Bond Scheme for Common Agricultural Policy Reform. CABI Publishing, London.