Emotional and non-emotional persuasion

Applied Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 849-879

  Miceli, Maria ^a   De Rosis, Fiorella ^b   Poggi, Isabella ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^c ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; GRAPH THEORY; MOTIVATION;

EMOTIONS; NON-EMOTIONAL PERSUASION; PERSUASION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33845671828     PISSN: 08839514     EISSN: 10876545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08839510600938193     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In: Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, eds. J. Kuhl, and J. Beckmann, 11-39. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
2. Arkes, H. R. and C. Blumer. 1985. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35:124-140.
3. Batra, R. and M. L. Ray. 1985. How advertising works at contact. In: Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects: Theory, Research, and Application, eds. L. Alwitt, and A. A. Mitchell, 13-43. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bazerman, M. 1988. Judgement in Managerial Decision Making. New York: Wiley.
5. Beisecker, T. D. and D. W. Parson. 1972. Introduction. In: The Process of Social Influence, eds. T. D. Beisecker, and D. W. Parson, 1-6. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Bell, J. and Z. Huang. 1997. Dynamic goal hierarchies. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Practical Reasoning and Rationality, pages 97-110. Manchester, United Kingdom.
7. Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Burnell, P. and A. Reeve. 1984. Persuasion as a political concept. British Journal of Political Science 14: 393-410.
9. Buss, D. M., R. Larsen, D. Westen, and J. Semmelroth. 1992. Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science 3:251-255.
10. Carofiglio, V. 2004. Modelling argumentation with belief networks. In: Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments (CMNA'04), pages 57-64, Valencia.
11. Carofiglio, V. and F. de Rosis. 2003. Combining logical with emotional reasoning in natural argumentation. In Proc. of the User Modeling (UM'03) Workshop on Affect, pages 9-15, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
12. Carofiglio, V., F. de Rosis, and R. Grassano. 2005. Dynamic models of mixed emotion activation. In: Animating Expressive Characters for Social Interactions, eds. D. Canamero, and R. Aylett, 173-192, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Castelfranchi, C. 1990. Social power: A missed point in DAI, MA and HCI. In: Decentralized AI, eds. Y. Demazeau, and J. P. Mueller, 49-62. North-Holland: Elsevier.
14. Castelfranchi, C. 1996. Reasons: Belief support and goal dynamics. Mathware and Soft Computing 3:233-247.
15. Castelfranchi, C. 2000. Affective appraisal versus cognitive evaluation in social emotions and interactions. In: Affective Interactions, ed. A. Paiva, 76-160. Springer: Berlin.
16. Chaiken, S., W. Wood, and A. H. Eagly. 1996. Principles of persuasion. In: Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, eds. E. T. Higgins, and A. W. Kruglanski, 702-742. New York: Guilford.
17. Cohen, P. R. and H. J. Levesque. 1990. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42:213-261.
18. Conte, R. and C. Castelfranchi. 1995. Cognitive and Social Action. London: University College.
19. Daly, M., M. Wiston, and S. J. Weghorst. 1982. Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology 3:11-27.
20. Das, S. 2002. Logic of probabilistic arguments. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'02), pages 9-18, Lyon, France.
21. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Frijda, N. H. 1986. The Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gordon, R. M. 1987. The Structure of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Grasso, F., A. Cawsey, and R. Jones. 2000. Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 53:1077-1115.
25. Gratton, C. 2002. Counterexamples and degree of support. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'02), pages 49-54, Lyon, France.
26. Green, N. 2003. Towards an empirical model of argumentation in medical genetics. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'03), pages 27-32, Acapulco, Mexico.
27. Guerini, M., O. Stock, and M. Zancanaro. 2003. Persuasion models for intelligent interfaces. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'03), pages 44-49, Acapulco, Mexico.
28. Haddadi, A. and K. Sundermeyer. 1996. Belief-desire-intention agent architectures. In: Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, eds. G. M. P. O'Hare, and N. R. Jennings, 169-185. London: Wiley.
29. Jennings, N., S. Parsons, P. Noriega, and C. Sierra. 1998. On argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of Int. Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 1-7, Boston, USA.
30. Jorgensen, P. F. 1998. Affect, persuasion, and communication processes. In: Handbook of Communication and Emotion, eds. P. A. Anderson, and L. K. Guerrero, 403-422. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Kienpointner, M. 1992. How to classify arguments. In: Argumentation Illuminated, eds. F. H. van Eermeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and C. A. Willard, 178-188. Amsterdam: SIE-SAT.
32. Lazarus, R. S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Levy, D. A., B. E. Collins, and P. R. Nail. 1998. A new model of interpersonal influence characteristics. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 13:715-733.
34. Lisetti, C. L. and P. Gmytrasiewicz. 2002. Can a rational agent afford to be affectless? A formal approach. Applied Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Merging Cognition and Affect in HCI 16:7-8.
35. Marcu, D. 2000. Perlocutions: The Achille's heel of speech act theory. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1719-1741.
36. Miceli, M. and C. Castelfranchi. 2002. Emozioni. In: Fondamenti di Cognitivismo Clinico, eds. C. Castelfranchi, F. Mancini, and M. Miceli, 96-129. Torino, Italy: Bollati Boringhieri.
37. Miller, G. A., E. Galanter, and K H. Pribram. 1960. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt.
38. Oatley, K. and P. N. Johnson-Laird. 1987. Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion 1:29-50.
39. O'Keefe, D. J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Ortony, A. 2003. On making believable emotional agents believable. In: Emotions in Humans and Artefacts, ed. R. P. Trappl, pages 189-212, Cambridge: MIT Press.
41. Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Networks of Plausible Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
42. Pears, D. 1984. Motivated Irrationality. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.
44. Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz, 123-205. New York: Academic Press.
45. Poggi, I. 2005. A goal and belief model of persuasion. Pragmatics and Cognition 13:297-336.
46. Poggi, I. and C. Pelachaud. 2000. Performative facial expressions in animated faces. In: Embodied Conversational Agents, eds. J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill, 155-188. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Rao, A. S. and M. P. Georgeff. 1995. BDI Agents: from theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First international Conference of Multiagent Systems (ICMAS-95), pages 312-319, San Francisco, California, USA.
48. Rosenblueth, A., N. Wiener, and J. Bigelow. 1968. Behavior, purpose and teleology. In: Modern System Research for the Behavioral Scientist, ed. W. Bucker, pages 221-225, Chicago: Aldine.
49. Rosselli, F., J. Skelly, and D. M. Mackie. 1995. Processing rational and emotional messages: The cognitive and affective mediation of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31:163-190.
50. Schwarz, N. 1990. Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In: Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, eds. E. T. Higgins, and R. M. Sorrentino, 527-561. New York: Guilford Press.
51. Sillince, J. A. A. and R. H. Minors. 1991. What makes a strong argument? Emotions, highly-placed values and role playing. Communication and Cognition 24(3-4):281-298.
52. Spiegelhalter, D. J. 1986. Probabilistic reasoning. In: Predictive Expert System, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, eds. L. N. Kanal, and J. F. Lemmer, 357-369. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
53. Symons, D. 1979. The Evolution of Human Sexuality New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Tooby, J. and L. Cosmides. 1990. The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environment. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:375-424.
55. Toulmin, S. 1958. The Use of Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
56. Walton, D. N. 1990. What is reasoning? What is argument? The Journal of Philosophy 87:399-419.
57. Walton, D. N. 1991. Nonfallacious arguments from ignorance. American Philosophical Quarterly 29(4):381-387.
58. Walton, D. N. 1992. The Place of Emotion in Argument. Philadelphia, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
59. Walton, D. N. 1996. Practical reasoning and the structure of fear appeal arguments. Philosophy and Rhetoric 29:301-313.
60. Walton, D. N. 2000. The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies. In: Syntheses 2000, 327-346. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publ.
61. Walton, D. N. and C. A. Reed. 2002. Argumentation schemes and defeasible inferences. In: WorkingNotes of the ECAI'2002 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, pages 45-55, Lyon, France.
62. Zukerman, I. and D. W. Albrecht. 2001. Predictive statistical models for user modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11:1-2.
63. Zukerman, I., N. Jinah, R. McConachy, and S. George. 2001. Recognizing intentions from rejoinders in a bayesian interactive argumentation system. In Proceedings of the Sixth Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI2000), pages 252-263, Melbourne, Australia.