Role allocation in human-robot interaction schemes for mission scenario execution

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 3588-3594

  Howard, Ayanna M ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human robot interaction; Performance assessment; Space exploration; Task allocation

Indexed keywords

HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SPACE EXPLORATION; TASK ALLOCATION;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; ROBOTICS; SPACE RESEARCH;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845665455     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.2006.1642250     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. G. Thomas, A.M. Howard, A. Williams, A. Moore-Alston, "Multi-Robot Task Allocation in Lunar Mission Construction Scenarios," IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Oct. 2005.
2. Fitts, P. M. (Ed.), Human engineering for an effective airnavigation and traffic control system, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Archives, 1951.
3. H.E. Price, R. E., Maisano, and H.P VanCott, The allocation of function in man-machine systems: A perspective and literature review, Oak Ridge, TN, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1982.
4. D. R. Olsen, Jr., and M. A. Goodrich, "Metrics for evaluating human- robot interactions," Proceedings of PERMIS 2003, September 2003.
5. M. Sierhuis, J.M. Bradshaw, A. Acquisti, R.V. Hoof, R. Jeffers, A. Uszok, "Human-Agent Teamwork and Adjustable Autonomy in Practice," Proc. 7th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS), Nara, Japan, 2003.
6. P. Rani, N. Sarkar, and C. A. Smith, "Affect-sensitive human-robot cooperation-theory and experiments," Proc. of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2382-2387, 2003.
7. P. Scerri, D. Pynadath, and M. Tambe, "Towards adjustable autonomy for the real-world," Journal of AI Research (JAIR), 2002, Volume 17, Pages 171-228.
8. G. Rodriguez and C. R. Weisbin, "A New Method to Evaluate Human-Robot System Performance," Autonomous Robots, 14(2-3), pp. 165-178, 2003.
9. A. Howard, "A Methodology to Assess Performance of Human-Robotic Systems in Achievement of Collective Tasks," IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, August 2005.
10. R. Parasuraman, T.B. Sheridan, and C.D. Wickens, "A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation," IEEE Tran, on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A, 30(3), 286-297, 2000.
11. T. Fong, D. Kaber, M. Lewis, J. Scholtz, A. Schultz, A. Steinfeld, "Common metrics for human-robot interaction," unpublished, 2004.
12. D. Gopher, L. Armony, and Y. Greenshpan, "Switching tasks and attention policy," J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 129, 308-339, 2000.
13. A. Allport, E.A. Styles, and S. Hsieh, "Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks," In C. Umilta, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
14. R.D. Rogers amd S. Monsell, "Constants of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks," Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231, 1995.
15. L.A. Zadeh, "Fuzzy Sets," Information and Control, 12:338-353, 1965.
16. D.E. Goldberg, "Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning," Addison-Wesley, 1989.
17. "President's Commission Report on Moon, Mars and Beyond: A Journey to Inspire, Innovate and Discover," Washington D.C, U.S. Government Printing Office, June 2004.