Bringing biophysical models into the economic laboratory: An experimental analysis of sediment trading in Australia

Ecological Economics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 584-595

  Tisdell, John ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

EMSS; Experimentation; Natural resource markets; Sediment trading

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICS; CATCHMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REGULATORY APPROACH; RUNOFF; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SOFTWARE;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

EID: 33845657908     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Argent R.M., and Mitchell V.G. FILTER: a Nutrient Management Program for the Port Phillip Catchment (1993), Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology, the University of Melbourne
2. Baumol W.J., and Oates W.E. Economics, Environmental Policy, and the Quality of Life (1993), Gregg Revivals, Aldershott, UK
3. Bouzaher A., and Shogren J. Modeling nonpoint source pollution in an integrated system. In: Martin W.E., and McDonald L.A. (Eds). Modeling Environmental Policy. Natural Resource Management and Policy Series (1997), Kluwer, Boston, Mass 7-42
4. Braden J.B., and Segerson K. Information problems in the design of nonpoint source pollution policy. In: Russell C., and Shogren J.F. (Eds). Theory, Modelling and Experience in the Management of Nonpoint-Source Pollution (1993), Kluwer, The Netherlands 1-34
5. Cason T.N., Gangadharan L., and Duke C. Market power in tradeable emission markets: a laboratory testbed for emission trading in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Ecological Economics 46 3 (2002) 469-491
6. Chew F., Scanlon P., Vertessy R., and Watson F. Catchment scale modeling of runoff sediment and nutrient loads for the southeast Queensland EMSS. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology. Technical Report 02/1 (2002)
7. Colby B.G. Cap-and-trade policy challenges: a tale of three markets. Land Economics 76 4 (2000) 635-658
8. Connell M. Community Group Involvement (1994), Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, Qld
9. Cooperative Research Center for Catchment Hydrology. EMSS User Guide (2002), CRCCH, Canberra
10. Davis D.D., and Holt C.A. Experimental Economics (1993), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
11. European Commission. Proposal for a Framework Directive for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Within the European Community-COM (2001) 581. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/emission.htm http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/emission.htm
12. Fang F., and Easter E.W. Pollution trading to offset new pollutant loadings - a case study in the Minnesota River basin. Paper Presented to the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada (2003)
13. Fullerton D., and Metcalf G.E. Cap and trade policies in the presence of monopoly and distortionary taxation. Resource and Energy Economics 24 4 (2002) 327-347
14. Groenenberg H., and Blok K. Benchmark-based emission allocation in a cap-and-trade system. Climate Policy 2 (2002) 105-109
15. Helfand G.E. Alternative pollution standards for regulating nonpoint source pollution. Journal of Environmental Management 45 (1995) 231-241
16. Keohane N.O., Revesz R.L., and Stavins R.N. The choice of regulatory instruments in environmental policy. Harvard Environmental Law Review 22 (1998) 313-367
17. Latacz-Lohmann U., and Van der Hamsvoost C. Auctios as a means of creating a market for public goods from agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics 49 (1997) 407-418
18. 2 market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41 3 (2001) 295-311
19. Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council. Annual report/National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. Australian Government Departments of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and the Environment and Heritage, Canberra (2004)
20. Roberts B.R. The birth of land care: collected papers on land use. Land Use Study Centre. 2nd edition (1995), University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld
21. Schmalensee R., Joskow P.L., Ellerman A.D., Montero J.P., and Bailey E.M. An interim evaluation of sulfur dioxide emissions trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (1998) 53-68
22. Schwarze R., and Zapfel P. Sulfur allowance trading and the regional clean air incentives market: a comparative design analysis of two major cap-and-trade permit programs. Environmental and Resource Economics 17 3 (2000) 279-298
23. Segerson K. Uncertainty and incentives for nonpoint pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (1988) 87-98
24. Shortle J.S., and Dunn J.W. The relative efficiency of agricultural source water pollution control policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics (1986) 668-677 (August)
25. Smith V.L., Williams A.W., Bratton W.K., and Vannoni M.G. Competitive market institutions: double auctions vs. sealed bid offer auctions. American Economic Review 72 1 (1982) 58-77
26. Stoneham G., Chaudhri V., Ha A., and Stappazzon L. Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's bust tender trial. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource (2003) 477-500
27. Tietenberg T., Grubb M., Michaelowa A., Swift B., and Zhang Z. International rules for greenhouse gas emissions trading: defining the principles, modalities, rules and guidelines for verification, reporting and accountability. Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (1999) 116 New York, Geneva
28. Vickery W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16 1 (1961) 8-37
29. Winters T. Clean skies initiative: new beginning or bait and switch?. The Electricity Journal (2002) 56-63
30. Williams C.C. Old Land New Landscapes: A Story of Farmers, Conservation and the Landcare Movement (2004), Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Vic.