On the weak invariance principle for stationary sequences under projective criteria

Journal of Theoretical Probability

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 647-689

  Merlevède, Florence ^a   Peligrad, Magda ^b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Central limit theorem; Martingale approximation; Projective criteria; Strong mixing sequences; Weak invariance principle

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845656782     PISSN: 08949840     EISSN: 15729230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10959-006-0029-y     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aldous, D. J., and Eagleson, G. K. (1978). On mixing and stability of limit theorems. Ann. Probab. 6, 325-331.
2. Ango Nzé, P., and Doukhan, P. (2002). Weak dependence: models and applications. In Dehling, H., Mikosch, T., and Sorensen M. (eds.), Empirical process techniques for dependent data, Birkhauser.
3. Billingsley, P. (1999). Convergence of Probability Measures, Second Edition, Wiley, New York.
4. Bingham, N. H., Goldie, C. M., and Teugels J. L. (1987). Regular Variation, Cambridge University Press.
5. Bradley, R. C. (1997). On quantiles and the central limit question for strongly mixing sequences. J. Theor. Probab. 10, 507-555.
6. Bradley, R. C. (2002). Introduction to Strong Mixing Conditions, Volume 1. Technical Report, Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington. Custom Publishing of I.U., Bloomington, March 2002.
7. Bradley, R. C. (2003). Introduction to Strong Mixing Conditions, Volume 2. Technical Report, Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington. Custom Publishing of I.U., Bloomington, March 2003.
8. Dedecker, J., and Rio, E. (2000). On the functional central limit theorem for stationary processes. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Stat. 36 1-34.
9. Dedecker, J., and Merlevède, F. (2002). Necessary and sufficient conditions for the conditional central limit theorem. Ann. Probab. 30, 1044-1081.
10. Dedecker, J., and Doukhan, P. (2003). A new covariance inequality and applications. Stoch. Process Appl. 106, 63-80.
11. Dehling, H., and Philipp, W. (2002). Empirical process techniques for dependent data. In Empirical process techniques for dependent data, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 3-113.
12. Dehling, H., Denker, M., and Philipp, W. (1986). Central limit theorems for mixing sequences of random variables under minimal conditions. Ann. Probab, 14, 1359-1370.
13. Denker, M. (1986). Uniform integrability and the central limit theorem for strongly mixing processes. In Eberlain, E., and Taqqu, M. S. (eds.), Dependence in Probability and Statistics. A Survey of Recent Results, Oberwolfach, 1985, Birkhäuser.
14. Gordin, M. I. (1969). The central limit theorem for stationary processes. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 188, 739-741.
15. Hall, P., and Heyde, C. C. (1980). Martingale Limit Theory and its Application. Academic Press.
16. Herrndorf, N. (1983). The invariance principle for φ-mixing sequences. Z. Wahrsch. verw. Gebiete, 63, 97-108.
17. Ibragimov, I. A. (1962). Some limit theorems for stationary processes. Teor. Verojatnost. i Primenen. 7, 361-392.
18. Ibragimov, I. A. (1975). A note on the central limit theorem for dependent random variables, Theory Probab. Appl., 20 135-141.
19. Ibragimov, I. A., and Linnik, Yu. V. (1971). Independent and Stationary Sequences of Random Variables, Wolters-Noordholf, Groningen.
20. Maxwell, M., and Woodroofe, M. (2000). Central limit theorems for additive functionals of Markov chains. Ann. Probab. 28, 713-724.
21. McLeish, D. L. (1975a). Invariance principles for dependent variables. Z. Wahrsch. verw. Gebiete, 32, 165-178.
22. McLeish, D. L. (1975b). A maximal inequality and dependent strong laws. Ann. Probab. 3, 829-839.
23. Merlevède, F. (2003). On the central limit theorem and its weak invariance principle for strongly mixing sequences with values in a Hilbert space via martingale approximation. J. Theoret. Probab. 16, 625-653.
24. Merlevède, F., and Peligrad, M. (2000). The functional central limit theorem for strong mixing sequences of random variables. Ann. Probab. 28(3), 1336-1352.
25. Móricz, F. A. (1976). Moment inequalities and the strong laws of large numbers. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheoreie verw. Gebiete. 35(4), 299-314.
26. Peligrad, M. (1982). Invariance principles for mixing sequences of random variables. Ann. Probab. 10, 968-981.
27. Peligrad, M. (1986). Recent advances in the central limit theorem and its weak invariance principles for mixing sequences of random variables. In Eberlein, E., and Taqqu, M. S. (eds.), Dependence in Probability and Statistics. A Survey of Recent Results, Birkhäuser, Boston.
28. Peligrad, M. (1990). On Ibragimov-Iosifescu conjecture for φ-mixing sequences. Stoch. Process. Appl. 35, 293-308.
29. Peligrad, M., and Utev, S. (2005). A new maximal inequality and invariance principle for stationary sequences. Ann. Probab. 33(2), 798-815.
30. Philipp, W. (1986). Invariance principles for independent and weakly dependent random variables. In Eberlein, E., and Taqqu, M. S. (eds.), Dependence in Probability and Statistics. A Survey of Recent Results, Birkhäuser, Boston.
31. Rényi, A. (1963). On stable sequences of events. Sankhya Ser. A 25, 293-302.
32. Rio, E. (2000). Théorie asymptotique des processus aléatoires faiblement dépendants. Mathématiques et applications de la SMAI. 31 Springer.
33. Rosenblatt, M. (1956). A central limit theorem and a strong mixing condition. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 42, 43-47.
34. Shao, Q. M. (1993). Almost sure invariance principles for mixing sequences of random variables. Stoch. Process. Appl. 48, 319-334.
35. Stout, W. (1974). Almost Sure Convergence, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London.
36. Wu, W. B., and Woodroofe, M. (2004). Martingale approximations for sums of stationary processes. Ann. Probab. 32(2), 1674-1690.