Business school rankings: Content and context

Journal of Management Development

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 49-53

  Peters, Kai ^a  

^a HULT INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Business schools; Measurement characteristics; Performance measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845653702     PISSN: 02621711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02621710710720086     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Corley, K. and Gioia, D. (2000), "The rankings game: Managing business school reputation", Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 319-33.
2. Garrett, G. (2001), "Interview", Selections, Fall, p. 5.
3. Giddens, A. (1976), New Rules of Sociological Method, Basic Books, New York, NY.
4. Martins, L. (1998), "The very visible hand of reputational rankings in US business schools", Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 293-8.
5. Schatz, M. (1993), "What's wrong with MBA ranking surveys?", Management Research News, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 15-19.
6. Tracy, J. and Waldvogel, J. (1997), "The best business schools: A market-based approach", Journal of Business, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 1-31.
7. Tyson, G. (2001), "A look behind the numbers", Selections, Fall, pp. 8-15.
8. van Roon, I. (2003), "Strength from within: How European business schools buffer the effect of rankings on their identity and reputation", Master's thesis, Erasmus University Centre for Corporate Reputation, Rotterdam.
9. Wuorio, J. (2001), "The impact of the rankings: Multiple perspectives", Selections, Fall, pp. 26-37.