Biological surveillance programme for the monitoring of crop pests and indicators in France

Journal fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit

Volumn 1, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages 30-36

  Delos, M ^a   Hervieu, F ^b   Folcher, L ^a   Micoud, A ^a   Eychenne, N ^a  

^a Bât E ^*  (France)

^b SDQPV DGAI   (France)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Biological survey; Biovigilance; General surveillance; GMO

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; AVES; FUNGI; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33845644104     PISSN: 16615751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00003-006-0066-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bourguet, D., Chaufaux, J., Micoud, A., Delos, M., Naîbo, B., Bombarde, F., Eychenne, N., Marque, G. and Pagliari, C. (2002) Ostrinia nubilalis parasitism and the field abundance of non-target insects in transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn. Env Bio Res 1:49-60.
2. Bourguet, D. and Chaufaux, J. (2002) Pyrale du Maïs et Maïs transgénique Bt: Sélection et gestion de la résistance. In A.I.P OGM et Environnement, Paris, pp. 62-69.
3. Castarena, P. and Ortego, F. (2000) Monitoring of Environmental Impacts of Genetically Modified Plants. Monitoring Corn Borer resistance. In: German Federal Environmental Agency. EU Workshop, Berlin, pp. 114-118.
4. Delos, M. and Schoonejans, E. (2000) Monitoring of Environmental Impacts of Genetically Modified Plants. Presentation of Monitoring Concepts of France. In: German Federal Environmental Agency. EU Workshop, Berlin, pp. 36-42.
5. Delos, M., Folcher, L., Eychenne, N. and Hervieu, F. (2005) O.G.M.: les réseaux de biovigilance in «les Enjeux phytosanitaires pour l'agriculture et l'environnement» C. Regnault-Roger - ed Tec et Doc Lavoisier, Paris, 27 p.
6. Hawes, C. et al. (2003) Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1899-1913. (DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1406.)
7. Heard, M. S. et al. (2003a) Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1819-1832. (DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1402.)
8. Heard, M. S. et al. (2003b) Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops. II. Effects on individual species. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1833-1846. (DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1401.)
9. Hintermann, U., Weber, D., Zangger, A. and Schmill, J. (2002) Biodiversity monitoring in Switzerland BDM Environmental - Swiss Agency for environment, forest and landscape - Series No 342.
10. Riba, G., Bourget, D., Chaufaux, J. and Delos, M. (2000) Case Study on Bt-Maize. In: German Federal Environmental Agency. EU Workshop, Berlin, pp. 119-123.
11. Roy, D. B. et al. (2003) Invertebrates and vegetation of field margins adjacent to crops subject to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1879-1898. (DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1404.)
12. Squire, G. R. et al. (2003) On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1779-1799. (DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1403.)