The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 547-548

  Olivera, Anna Belsuzarri ^a   Matson, Edmir ^a   Marques, Márcia Martins ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; DUCERAM; EMPRESS 2; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; LITHIUM DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MASTICATION; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; HUMANS; LITHIUM COMPOUNDS; MASTICATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ABRASION;

EID: 33845623785     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Jacobi R, Shillingburg HT, Duncanson MG. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:303-309.
2. Al-Hiyasat AS, Saunders WP, Smith GM. Three-body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:476-481.
3. Segui RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 1991;70:221-225.
4. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF. Evaluating the antagonist wear of restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:74-80.
5. Palmer DS, Barco MT, Pelleu Jr GB, McKinney JE. Wear of human enamel against a commercial castable ceramic restorative material. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:192-195.