Perspective taking promotes action understanding and learning (Retraction in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (2008) 34:5 (1287))

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1405-1421

  Lozano, Sandra C ^a   Martin Hard, Bridgette ^a   Tversky, Barbara ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Infancy; Object perception; Perceptual development; Size constancy; Size perception

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; IMITATION; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; OBSERVATION; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; GOALS; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; INTENTION; LINEAR MODELS; OBSERVATION; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 33845618103     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1405     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Neural expectations: A possible evolutionary path from manual skills to language. Communication and Cognition, 29, 393-424.
2. Aziz-Zadeh, L., Maeda, F., Zaidel, E., Mazziotta, J., & Iacoboni, M. (2002). Lateralization in motor facilitation during action observation: A TMS study. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 127-131.
3. Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72, 708-717.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Bain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
6. Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513-562.
7. Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Byrne, R. W., & Russon, A. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 667-709.
9. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
10. Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: Using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1170-1179.
11. Cheng, Y. W., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D., Decety, J., & Hsieh, J. C. (2005). Modulation of spinal excitability during observation of bipedal locomotion. NeuroReport, 16, 1711-1714.
12. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 257-271.
13. Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713-726.
14. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & Olivier, E. (2005). Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others' action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 213-218.
15. Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 109-124.
16. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.
17. Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography: II. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
18. Hard, B. M., Lozano, S. C., & Tversky, B. (in press). Hierarchical encoding of behavior: Translating perception into action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
19. Hard, B. M., Tversky, B., & Lang, D. (in press). Segmenting abstract events: Building event schemas. Memory and Cognition.
20. Hard, B. M., Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2006). Inferring structure in behavior: The role of goals and language. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University and Washington University.
21. Hart, R. A., & Moore, G. T. (1973). The development of spatial cognition. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and environment (pp. 246-288). Chicago: Aldine.
22. Iacoboni, M. (2005). Understanding others: Imitation, language, empathy. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 77-100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999, December). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
24. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422-431.
25. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112-146). Oxford, England: Wiley.
26. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Lozano, S. C., Hard, B. M., & Tversky, B. (in press). Putting action in perspective. Cognition.
28. Martin, B. A. (2006). Reading the language of action: Hierarchical encoding of behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
29. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Reenactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838-850.
30. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28-38.
32. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
33. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21, 188-194.
34. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (1999). Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 137, 85-100.
35. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 102-106.
36. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37. Travis, L. L. (1997). Goal-based organization of event memory in toddlers. In P. W. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer, & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 111-138). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
39. Vorauer, J. D., & Cameron, J. J. (2002). So close, and yet so far: Does collectivism foster transparency overestimation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1344-1352.
40. Whiten, A. (2002). The imitator's representation of the imitated: Ape and child. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 98-121). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473.
42. Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., et al. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 651-655.
43. Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 29-58.