Bridging gaps among curriculum, teaching and learning, and assessment

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 499-512

  Jang, Eunice Eunhee ^a   Ryan, Katherine E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845599559     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220270305521     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, AND NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION (1985) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association).
2. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, AND NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION (1999) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association).
3. ANGOFF, W. H. (1971) Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (ed.), Educational Measurement, 2nd edn (Washington, DC: American Council on Education), 508-600.
4. BRENNAN, R. L. (1998) Misconceptions at the intersection of measurement theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17 (1), 5-9.
5. BRENNAN, R. L. (2001) Some problems, pitfalls, and paradoxes in educational measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20 (4), 6-18.
6. CHUDOWSKY, N. and BEHUNIAK, P. (1997) Establishing the consequential validity for large-scale performance assessments. Paper presented at the National Council of Measurement in Education, Chicago.
7. CLARKE, M., ABRAMS, L. and MADAUS, G. (2001) The effects and implications of high-stakes achievement tests for adolescents. In T. Urdon and F. Pujarts (eds), Adolescence and Education: General Issues in the Education of Adolescents (Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing), 201-229.
8. COLE, N. S. and ZIEKY, M. J. (2001) The new faces of fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38 (4), 369-382.
9. DESTEFANO, L. and PRESTINE, N. (2000) Evaluation of the Implementation of Illinois Learning Standards: Year Two Report (Springfield, IL: Illinois State Board of Education).
10. DESTEFANO, L. and PRESTINE, N. (2001) Evaluation of the Implementation of Illinois Learning Standards: Year Three Report (Springfield, IL: Illinois State Board of Education).
11. EBEL, R. L. (1972) Essentials of Educational Measurement (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
12. EISNER, E. W. (2001) What does it mean to say a school is doing well? Phi Delta Kappan, 82 (5), 367-372.
13. GREENO, J. G., COLLINS, A. M. and RESNICK, L. B. (1996) Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology (New York: Macmillan), 15-45.
14. HAERTEL, E. H. (1999) Validity arguments for high-stakes testing: in search of evidence. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18 (4), 5-9.
15. HAERTEL, E. H. (2002) Standard setting as a participatory process: implications for validation of standards-based accountability programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21 (4), 5-9.
16. HAUSER, R. M. (2001) Should we end social promotion? truth and consequences. In G. Orfield and M. L. Kornhaber (eds), Raising Standards or Raising Barriers?: Inequality and High-stakes Testing in Public Education (NewYork: The Century Foundation Press), 128-151.
17. HEUBERT, J. P. and HAUSER, R. M. (eds) (1999) High Stakes: Testing for Tracking, Promotion, and Graduation. Report of the Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education and National Research Council (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
18. JOINT COMMITTEE ON TESTING PRACTICES (1988) Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education http://www.apa.org/science/fairtestcode.html, (visited 15 January 2003).
19. JOINT COMMITTEE ON TESTING PRACTICES (2002) Draft for Comment: Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education http://www.apa.org/science/code-draft.html, (visited 15 January 2003).
20. KANE, M. J. (2001) So much remains the same: conception and status of validation in setting standards. In G. J. Cizek (ed.), Setting Performance Standards (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 53-88.
21. KORETZ, D. M., BARRON, S., MITCHELL, K. J. and STECHER, B. M. (1996) Perceived Effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System MR-792-PCT/FF (Santa Monica, CA: Rand).
22. KORNHABER, M. L. and ORFIELD, G. (2001) High-stakes testing policies: examining their assumptions and consequences. In G. Orfield and M. L. Kornhaber (eds), Raising Standards or Raising Barriers?: Inequality and High-stakes Testing in Public Education (New York: The Century Foundation Press), 1-18.
23. LEVIN, H. M. (2001) High-stakes testing and economic productivity. In G. Orfield and M. L. Kornhaber (eds), Raising Standards or Raising Barriers?: Inequality and High-stakes Testing in Public Education (New York: The Century Foundation Press), 39-50.
24. MADAUS, G. (1994) A technological and historical consideration of equity issues associated with proposals to change the nation's testing policy. Harvard Educational Review, 64 (1), 76-95.
25. MADAUS, G. and CLARKE, M. (2001) The adverse impact of high-stakes testing on minority students: evidence from one hundred years of test data. In G. Orfield and M. L. Kornhaber (eds), Raising Standards or Raising Barriers?: Inequality and High-stakes Testing in Public Education (New York: The Century Foundation Press), 52-85.
26. MITZEL, H. C., LEWIS, D. M., PATZ, R. J. and GREEN, D. R. (2001) The bookmark procedure: psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (ed.), Setting Performance Standards (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 249-282.
27. MOSS, P. A. and SCHUTZ, A. (2001) Educational standards, assessment, and the search for consensus. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (1), 37-70.
28. NEDELSKY, L. (1954) Absolute grading standards for objective tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14 (1), 1-19.
29. PHILLIPS, S. E. (2002) Legal issues affecting special populations in large-scale testing programs. In G. Tindal and T. M. Haladyna (eds), Large-scale Assessment Programs for All Students: Validity, Technical Adequacy, and Implementation (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 109-148.
30. PORTER, A. C. (1995) The uses and misuses of opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Researcher, 24 (1), 21-27.
31. PORTER, A. C. (2002) Measuring the content of instruction: uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31 (7), 3-14.
32. ROTHSTEIN, R. (2002) How US punishes states with higher standards. The New York Times, 18 September.
33. RYAN, K. E. (2002a) Assessment validation in the context of high stakes assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 21 (1), 7-15.
34. RYAN, K. E. (2002b) Shaping educational accountability systems. American Journal of Evaluation, 23 (4), 453-468.
35. STECHER, B. and CHUN, T. (2001) School and Classroom Practices During Two Years of Educational Reform in Washington State. CSE Technical Report No. 550 (University of California, Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing). http:/cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/CRESST/ Reports/TR550.pdf, visited 5 January 2003.
36. STEVENS, R. A., BUTLER, F. A. and CASTELLON-WELLINGTON, M. C. (2000) Academic Language and Content Assessment: Measuring the Progress of English Language Learners (ELLs). CSE Technical Report No. 552 (University of California, Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing). http:/cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/CRESST/Reports/TR555.pdf, visited 5 January 2003.
37. WILLINGHAM, W. W. and COLE, N. S. (1997) Gender and Fair Assessment (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).